期刊文献+

教师绩效评价的理论与实践 被引量:105

Theory and Practice on Teacher Performance Appraisal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师绩效评价是教育人事制度改革的关键,20世纪80年代以来,它成为了教育改革的重点和难点。在以往有关教师评价的研究中,三种不同类型的评价常常被混用;而对教师绩效的评价又常常只关注任务绩效,没有关注关系绩效;此外,大多数教师评价研究均是关于大学教师的。教师绩效评价应以教师绩效结构的理论分析为基础。基于教师素质结构理论,在文献分析和关键事件调查、关键事件访谈的基础上,通过定性分析和实证分析,在反复研究基础上,提出了教师绩效的结构,并通过实证研究探讨了教师绩效评价的信度与效度。 Teacher performance appraisal is the key to educational personnel reform. Since 1980's, it has become the pivot and nodus of educational change. In the past studies on teacher appraisal, they were all about college teachers, and three different types were usually been confusedly used. At the same time, teacher performance appraisal often only focused on task performance, not on contextual performance. Teacher performance appraisal must be based on teacher performance construction theoretical analysis. Ground on teacher competence construction theory, on the basis of literature analysis, critical incidents investigation and critical incidents interview, through qualitative and quantitative analysis, we propose teacher performance construction. Reliability and validity of teacher performance appraisal are also discussed.
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期36-41,共6页 Teacher Education Research
基金 北京市教育科学"十五"规划课题 全国教育科学"十五"规划重点课题(CBA030044)
关键词 教师绩效评价 任务绩效 关系绩效 teacher performance appraisal task performance contextual performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1蔡永红,林崇德.绩效评估研究的现状及其反思[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001(4):119-126. 被引量:173
  • 2蔡永红.对教师绩效评估研究的回顾与反思[J].高等师范教育研究,2001,13(3):73-76. 被引量:96
  • 3[6]Marsh H W, Dunkin M J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In:Smart. Journal Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon, 1992 ed.
  • 4Borman W C,Motowidlo S J.Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In:Schmitt N, Borman W C. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993 ed,71~98.
  • 5Marsh,H.W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11(3),253-388.
  • 6Feldman,K.A.(1989). Association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research of Higher Education. 30(6),137-194.
  • 7Aubrecht,J.D., Hanna G.S., & Hoyt,D.P. (1986). A comparison of high school student ratings of teaching effectiveness with teacher self-ratings: Factor analytic and multitrait - multimethod analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 46(1):223-31.
  • 8Fox,R., Peck, R.F., Blattstein, A., & Blattstein,D.(1983).Student evaluation of teacher as a measure of teacher behavior and teacher impact on students. Journal of Educational Research.77(1): 15-21.
  • 9胡瑞文.中国教育与人力资源问题报告[J].教育发展研究,2003,23(4):1-1. 被引量:36
  • 10蔡永红,林崇德.同事评价教师绩效的结构验证性因素分析[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(1):38-42. 被引量:17

二级参考文献32

  • 1[1]Marsh H W, Dunkin M J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In: Smart. Journal Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon, 1992.
  • 2[3]Borman W C, Motowidlo S J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman W C. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1993,71 - 98.
  • 3[4]Flanagan J C. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, (51) ,327 - 358.
  • 4Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1994), Looking in classroom(6^th ed). HarperCollins Press.
  • 5林德.教育的智慧—写给中小学教师[M].开明出版社,1999.
  • 6Bernardin.H.J. & Beatty,R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal:Assessing human behavior at work. Kent Publishers.
  • 7Murphy,K. J.& Cleveland,j. n, (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective.Allyn & Bacon publishers.
  • 8Shinkfied, A, T,& Stuffleheam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 9Bernardin,H. J. ,Hangan,C. M. ,Kane,J. S. & Villanova,P. ,In Performance Appraisal:State of the Art in Practice ,Simither ,J. W. editor ,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
  • 10Cardy, R. L. , & Dobbins, G. H. , Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives, Cincinnati, OH: SouthWestern Publishing Co. ,1994.

共引文献302

同被引文献547

引证文献105

二级引证文献308

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部