期刊文献+

SBR污水生化处理系统的最优控制及改进 被引量:8

Improved optimal control of SBR biological wastewater treatment systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对序批式反应器污水处理工艺,提出一种以排水质量指标为约束条件,以能量消耗最小为目标的最优控制方案.由于生化过程机理复杂,导致这个最优问题求解困难.所构造的解法是首先建立通用的序批式反应器模型;然后借助仿真工具试差求取次优解.为解决搜索求解计算量大的问题,进一步结合进退法提出了一种改进的优化算法,显著提高了求解效率. An optimal control scheme for sequencing batch reactor (SBR) wastewater treatment processes is proposed to achieve the wastewater effluent standards with minimal energy consumption. Because of the complex mechanism in biological processes, it is difficult to solve this optimization problem. The constructed solving process is to establish a general SBR model firstly, then to derive the suboptimum solution by trial and error method with the help of simulation tools. To solve the problem of large search solution computation, an improved optimization algorithm is proposed based on the thought of advance-retreat method, and it raises the solution efficiency significantly.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期237-240,共4页 Control and Decision
关键词 序批式反应器 污水生化处理 最优控制 Biological water treatment Computer simulation Energy efficiency Optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1樊立萍,于海斌,袁德成.序批式反应器污水处理工艺建模与控制研究[J].信息与控制,2004,33(2):202-207. 被引量:6
  • 2袁德成,樊立萍,于海斌.典型污水生化处理过程仿真平台的构造[J].系统仿真学报,2003,15(11):1509-1513. 被引量:12
  • 3Srinivasan B, Palanki S, Bonvin D. Dynamic optimization of batch processes I: Characterization of the nominal solution [J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(1): 1-26.
  • 4Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, et al. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d, ASM3[M]. London:IWA Publishing, 2000: 14-26.
  • 5Alex J, Beteau J, Copp J, et al. Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plant [ A ]. Proc of European Control Conf [ C ].Karlsruhe, 1999: 1-7.

二级参考文献89

  • 1Pore M N.URL.http://www.ensic.u-nancy.fr/COSTWWTP,.
  • 2Relmstrom A. Automatic Control of an Activated Sludge Process in a Wastewater Treatment Plants - a Benchmark Study [D]. Master Thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden, 2000.
  • 3Alex J, Beteau J, Copp J, et al. Benchmark for Evaluating Control Strategies in Wastewater Treatment Plant [C]. In: ECC99', Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • 4Lennox J. Multivariate Subspaces for Fault Detection and Isolation: with Applications to Wastewater Treatment Process [D]. PhD thesis, 2002.
  • 5Gemaey K, Mussat/M, Yuan Z, Nielsen M K, et al. Control strategy evaluation for combined N and P removal using a benchmark wastewater treatment plant [C]. 15^th IFAC, Barcelona, Spain, 2002.
  • 6Henze M, Cmjer W, Mino T , va Loosdrecht M. Activated Sludge Models ASMI, ASM2, ASM2d, ASM3 [M]. IWA Scientific and Technical Reports, London, 2000.
  • 7Takacs I, Patry G, Nolasco D. A dynamic model of the clarificationthickening process [J]. Water Research, 1991,25(10): 1263-1271.
  • 8Pons M N , Corriou J P. Implementation of storage tanks on the COST 624 benchmark [C]. In: Proceedings 1^st IWA Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation, Maimo, Sweden, 2001,253-259.
  • 9Pons M N, Jeppsson U, Copp J , Spanjers H. Benchmarking the evaluation of control strategies in wastewater treatment: The four-year story of the COST benchmark [C]. In: Proccedings 8th International Conference on Computer Applications in Biotechnology, Quebec, Canada, 2001, 231-237.
  • 10Hopkins L, Iart P, NeweU R. Using the flexibility index to compare batch and continuous activated sludge processes [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2001,43 (3) :35 - 43.

共引文献16

同被引文献68

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部