摘要
《水经注》索劢楼兰屯田究系何时，学界长期争论不休，楼兰出土文书提供了探讨的新契机。《水经注》谓劢在楼兰“大田三年”，而Ｃ．１６．１（楼６１）残纸记有楼兰屯府汇报“嘉平四年三月司徒府癸丑书署军”至“（正元）二年正月戊寅”间事宜之文件，符合“大田三年”之时限。《水经注》所见当事人索劢、毛奕两人正史均未载，然劢祷词所引“古”人王尊、王霸、耿恭分属两汉，而楼兰文书中迄未发现确属东汉者，均可佐证索劢非属东汉。东汉中晚期积弱不振，也无可能遣出“行贰师将军”出屯楼兰。本文还探讨了索劢于楼兰屯田如日中天之际突然东返的重大事件背景，进而讨论了《三国志》与《晋书》失载索劢楼兰屯田史事之原因。
The question of when Suo Mai of Dunhuang in Loulan by means of military labor engaging in farming, which fact had recorded in the great work of ANNOTATION OF THE WATE RS written by LI Daoyuan, were hotly discussed by academic circle and left unce rtain. This article trying to make up the historical deficiency by supplying th e manuscripts unearthed from Loulan to discussing in detail for the reasons of why the historical recorder like The Record of The Threee Kingdoms, The Jin Bo ok had left blank to recording the fact of Suo Mai and his story of engaging in farm as military force at Loulan.
出处
《敦煌研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第1期73-80,共8页
Dunhuang Research
