期刊文献+

论互相依赖的有限与国家政策对全球化影响的限制 被引量:4

On the Limit of Interdependence and Restrictions of State Policy's Impact on Globalization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球国际体系的基本性质在变动中的继续,颇大程度上归因于互相依赖仍有相当大 局限:(1)全球国际/跨国非政治性交往大部分是在发达世界内部进行;(2)发达世界与 欠发达世界之间的非政治性交往大部分是从前者到后者的单向流动;(3)欠发达国家及其 社会互相间的交往只是全球交往总和中的最小部分。迄今为止全球化只是在发达世界之内才 造就了真正的互相依赖。与此相关,互相依赖的两大特性——敏感性与易受伤害性——在分 布上也大不平衡:欠发达国家与发达国家相比,一般有大得多的敏感性与易受伤害性,其原 因是两者间互相依赖的严重不对称。国际/跨国互相依赖的相当大局限性还表现为大多数国 家相当广泛和顽强地限制互相依赖,或者说采取限制和抵制全球化影响的政策。用根本的政 治经济学哲理来说,在市场与国家这一关系中,当市场削弱或剥夺国家的某些权能时,国家 会倾向于抵抗,并且谋求新的权能。 The relevance of the basic features of changing global international system is, to a large extent, due to the limit of interdependence. Firstly, most of the international or transnational nona2political interactions are taking place in the developed world. Secondly, nona2political interactions between the developed world and the underdeveloped world are mostly onea2way flow from the former to the latter. Thirdly, interactions in the underdeveloped world and in its societies constitute a small number of contacts in the world. Only in the developed world so far has Globalization produced real term interdependence. Meanwhile, the two major features of interdependence-sensitivity and vulnerability are unevenly distributed. Compared with the developed countries, the underdeveloped countries have more sensitivity and vulnerability due to serious asymmetry between the two worlds. Limit of international or transnational interdependence is also reflected in widea-ranging and persistent resistance against globalization by majority of countries in the world or policies adopted to restrict and resist the impact of globalization. In terms of theory of political economy, the relationship between market and state determines that when the market attempts to undermine and deprive some rights of the state, the state would tend to resist and seek for a new means to maintain the rights.
作者 时殷弘
出处 《国际问题研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第2期25-31,共7页 International Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1关于这两点,见Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977) pp,278-279.
  • 2这项研究系由美国A.T.基尔尼咨询公司(A.T.Kearney Inc.)和《对外政策》杂志联合从事并发表.见"Measuring Globalization," Foreign Policy, January/February 2001.
  • 3William Cummings, "Global Trends in Overseas Study", in Crauford D. Goodwin ed.,International Investment in Human Capital: Overseas Education in Development (New York: Institute of International Education, 1993), p. 31.
  • 4Janice E. Thomson and Stephen D. Krasner, "Global Transactions, and the Consolidation of Sovereignty, " in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 202-293.
  • 5典型情况是约三分之二的销售和四分之三的资产在母国.见Paul Hirst,"Power,"in Tim Dunne et al.eds.,The Eighty Years Crisis: International Relations, 1919-1999(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 141.
  • 6Ibid.
  • 7Pearson and Rochester, International Relations, 4th edition, pp. 110, 478-479.
  • 8Ibid.,p.496.正如一位学者所说,"北美、日本和欧洲既是大多数国际投资的来源、又在其目的地占据支配地位."Norman Lewis"GlobaLization and the End of the Nation-State, "Paper delivered at Annual Meeting of International Studies Association, San Diego, April 18, 1996p.24.引自ibid.
  • 9Ibid.,p.110.它们当中的小国,特别是荷兰、瑞士、瑞典等,被认为是世界上全球化程度最高的国家,因为它们相对最多地从其他发达国家输入商品、劳务和资本,那是它们的狭小规模所难以产出的;与此同时,"它们狭小的国内市场和受教育程度很高的职工导致了真正全球性的大公司,能够在世界上任何地方竞争."见"Measuring Globalization," para. 14.
  • 10John Spanier and Robert L. Wendzel, Games Nations Play, edition(Washington, D. C., CQ Press, 1996), p. 398 引文.

同被引文献43

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部