期刊文献+

多层面螺旋CT结肠仿真内镜的实验研究 被引量:8

Experimental study of multi-slice CT virtual colography in pig colon
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨MSCT结肠仿真内镜优化的成像参数。方法 猪结肠 8段 ,于肠壁内面模拟病变后行MSCT扫描 ,准直层厚 1.0mm、2 .5mm、5 .0mm ,螺距 1.2 5、1.75及重叠重建率 0 %、5 0 %、70 %分别匹配 ,共 16组图像分别行VC观察。结果 第 1组 (准直层厚 1.0mm ,Pitch 1.2 5 ,重叠重建率 5 0 % )病变检出准确率最高 ,但与第 2~ 4、9~ 12组病变检出率无明显差异 ,其中第 12组 (准直层厚 2 .5mm ,Pitch 1.75 ,重叠重建率 5 0 % )的扫描时间和CTDI最小 ,容积重建法VC的检出准确率高于表面重建法VC。结论 层厚和重叠重建率对MSCTVC的病变检出准确率有明显影响 ,优化参数为 :准直层厚 2 .5mm ,螺距 1.75 ,5 0 %重叠重建 ,容积重建法VC。 Objective To investigate the optimized parameters of multi slice CT virtual colography (MSCT VC). Methods Eight segments of pig colon were resected and cleaned, and simulated polyps with different size were created on the mucosa of colon. Each specimen was scanned with collimation of 1.0 mm, 2.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and pitch of 1.25, 1.75, reconstructed with 0%, 50%, 70% overlap, respectively. The images were classified into 16 groups by different parameters, and VC with volume perspective mode were processed. The accuracy of polyps detection was evaluated in each group. Results Group 1 (collimation 1.0mm, Pitch 1.25, overlap rate 50%) had the maximal accuracy of polyps detection, but there was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2-4, 9-12. Group 12 (collimation 2.5mm, Pitch 1.75, overlap rate 50%) had the least scan time and CTDI, but VC with volume perspective mode was superior to that with surface perspective mode. Conclusion In experimental condition, MSCT VC were significantly affected by the collimation and overlapping rate. The optimized parameters were as follows: collimation 2.5 mm, pitch 1.75 and 50% overlapped reconstruction, and with volume perspective VC.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第1期29-32,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 多层螺旋CT 仿真内镜 结肠 动物 实验 Multi-slice spiral CT Virtual endoscopy Colon Animals, laboratory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张挽时,王东,温兆赢,王萍.CT结肠造影结肠息肉的实验与临床应用研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(7):843-846. 被引量:12
  • 2吴国庚,王妍焱,王玉林,叶晓华.多层螺旋CT在大肠癌诊断中的作用[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(11):1538-1540. 被引量:13
  • 3Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique[J]. Gastroenterology, 1996, 110(1): 284-290.
  • 4Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, et al. Virtual endoscopy-comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon[J]. Endoscopy, 2000, 32(3): 226-232.
  • 5Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography[J]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, 2001, 173(12): 1069-1071.
  • 6Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96(2): 394-400.
  • 7Dachman AH, Lieberman J, Osnis RB, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography[J]. Radiology, 1997,203(2):427-430.
  • 8McFarland EG, Brink JA, Loh J, et al. Vasualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering[J]. Radiology, 1997, 205(3): 701-707.
  • 9Cohnen M, Vogt C, Aurich A, et al. Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique-preliminary result[J]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, 2002, 174(7): 835-838.

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]Mcfhand EG,Brink JA.Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy):The challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability[J].AJR,1999,173(3):549-559.
  • 2[3]Maxjzeld RG.Colonscopy as a routine preoperative procedure for carcinoma ofthe colon[J].Am J Surg,1984,147(4):477-480.
  • 3[4]Neri E,Giusti P,Battolla L,et al.Colorectal Cancer:role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy [J].Radiology,2002,223(3):615-619.
  • 4[5]Macari M,Bini EJ,Xue X,et al.Colorectal neoplasms:prospective comparison of twin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection[J].Radiology,2002,224(2):383-392.
  • 5[6]Yee J,Kumar NN,Mung RK,et al.Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in comparison at CT colonography[J].Radiology,2003,226(3):653-561.
  • 6[7]Morrin MM,Farrell RJ,Kruskal JB,et al.Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography[J].Radiology,2000,217(3):765-771.
  • 7Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. Colorectal neoplasia : Performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients[J]. Radiology,2001,219(3) :685-692.
  • 8Johnson CD, Ferrucci JT, Ros PR. Virtual colonoscopy viable screening tool for polyps[J]. RSNA news,2002,12(6) :8-10.
  • 9Dachman AH, Lieberman J,Osnis RB, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: Sensitivity of CT ritual colonography[J]. Radiology,1997,203(2):427-430.
  • 10Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colonography: Initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity[J]. Radiology, 1997,205 (1) : 59-65.

共引文献22

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部