期刊文献+

以人为本:国内外有关学术争鸣述评 被引量:1

Taking Human Beings as the Essential: A General Review on the Academic Argument at Home and Abroad
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "以人为本"目前在国外首先是在发展观论争中被凸现的。离开生产力标准,抽象呼求自由、平等和人权是西方人道主义的老毛病。在国内,周扬等人倡言人道主义,而胡乔木和黄楠森等先生从历史观上否定人道主义,形成两种意见。黄先生至今对"以人为本"的理论怀疑陷于过时模式,而薛德震先生对他的批评是有道理的。 The concept of 'taking human beings as the essential' appears recently in the argument on the view of development in foreign countries. Abstractly appealing to the liberty, equality and human rights without mentioning the standard of productivity is the old fault of the western humanism. In this aspect, there have been two opinions in China: Some scholars with Zhou Yang as the representative proposed humanism, while other scholars, such as Hu Qiaomu and Huang Nan, denied humanism from the historic view. Mr. Huang has been suspecting the theory of 'taking human beings as the essential' and it is rational for Mr.Xue Dezheng to criticize Huang′s view.
作者 胡义成
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期95-98,共4页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词 “以人为本” 人道主义 述评 'taking human beings as the essential' humanism general review
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1胡义成.人道悖歌——马克思主义人道主义新论[M].北京:华夏出版社,1996..
  • 2王锐生.以人为本的社会历史观意义[N].人民日报,2004-09-03.
  • 3黄楠森.以人为本凸显人道主义价值观[N].人民日报,2004-09-03.
  • 4.马克思主义与人道主义[N].光明日报,2003-08-19.
  • 5.马克思主义与“以人为本”[N].北京日报,2004-03-01.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部