期刊文献+

论公司收购中控股股东的诚信义务 被引量:5

On the Fiduciary Duty of the Control Shareholders in the Course of Buying Over the Corporation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在公司收购过程中 ,不论是收购方还是目标公司内部都存在控股股东和广大中小股东不同的利益诉求。相对于小股东来讲 ,大股东滥用其优势地位损害公司其他利益主体利益的机率较高。因此建立控股股东诚信义务规则与平衡大股东和中小股东的权益之间是息息相关的。控股股东诚信义务原则的确立 ,是对传统公司法理论中的资本多数原则、表决权自由行使原则和有限责任理论的扬弃和修正。控股股东的诚信义务主要包括控股股东的忠实义务和注意义务。其基本要求是 ,当控股股东自身的利益和其他利益主体的利益发生冲突时 ,控股股东应将其他利益主体的利益放在首位 。 In the course of buying over a corporation, there exist different demands in the control shareholders and the wide medium and small shareholders whether they are buying over side or in the inner part of the target corporation. Comparatively speaking, the interest of the medium and small shareholders is easily infringed upon by the control shareholders with their superior position. So, it is important to set up the fiduciary duty rule for control shareholders and regulate the right and interest of all the shareholders and it is the sublation and the modification of the capital majority principle, the free use of vote right and the limited duty theory in the traditional corporate legal theory to set up fiduciary duty rule for the control shareholders. The fiduciary duty for the control shareholders mainly includes the honest duty and the attention duty, whose basic demand is when the interest of the control shareholder and that of other shareholders contradicts, the control shareholders should put other shareholders'interest first but not implement any harmful action to them.
作者 赵万一 胡军
出处 《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期52-55,共4页 Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词 公司收购 控股股东 诚信义务 忠实义务 注意义务 Buying over a corporation control shareholder fiduciary duty honest duty attention duty.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献24

  • 1沈田丰.关联交易的性质、影响与规范[J].现代法学,1999,21(3):90-92. 被引量:11
  • 2施天涛.关联企业的公司法调整[J].政法论坛,1998,16(6):25-33. 被引量:14
  • 3王保树.现代股份公司法发展中的几个趋势性问题[J].中国法学,1992(6):62-69. 被引量:33
  • 4李哲松 吴日焕译.《韩国公司法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,2000年版.第354页.
  • 5何美欢.《公众公司及其股权证券》,北京大学出版社2000年版,第803页.
  • 6何美欢.《公众公司与股权证券》[M].北京大学出版社,2000年版.第823页.
  • 7Recent Cases.Harvard law review vo183 p1904.
  • 8E.Allan Famsworth's Contracts,2nd Edition, p115. Little Brown and Company, 1990.
  • 9Harvard law review, vol83 p1907.
  • 10[加]布莱恩·R·柴芬斯.《公司法:理论、结构与运作》.法律出版社,2001年版,第505页,第33页.

共引文献15

同被引文献44

  • 1徐敏霞,丛华程.公司收购法律制度研究[J].中共青岛市委党校青岛行政学院学报,2004(3):90-93. 被引量:3
  • 2朱慈蕴.资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务[J].法学研究,2004,26(4):104-116. 被引量:218
  • 3刘映春.中小股东权利保护若干问题[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2006,25(5):99-103. 被引量:6
  • 4Stephen A. Ross. The Economic Theory of Agency : The Principal' s Problem [ J ]. American Economic Association, Vol. 63, 1973: 134.
  • 5M. C. Jensen, W. Meckling. Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 1976:305 - 360.
  • 6Margaret M. Blair, Lynn A. Stout. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law [ J ]. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 85, 1999:248 - 249.
  • 7亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究:下册[M].郭大力,王亚南,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:303.
  • 8Frank H. Easterbrook, Daniel R. Fischel. Voting in Corporate Law[J]. The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 26, 1983 : 405.
  • 9Guhan Subramanian. The Influence of Antitakeover Statutes on Incorporation Choice: Evidence on the "Race" Debate and Antitakeover Overreaching [ J ]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 150, 2002: 1798.
  • 10Paul H. Edelman, Randall S. Thomas. Corporate Voting and the Takeover Debate [ J ]. Vanderbih Law Review, Vol. 58, 2005: 463.

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部