期刊文献+

应用功能综合评定量表评估早期康复对脑卒中患者功能结局的影响 被引量:8

Effects of early rehabilitation on the functional outcomes of stroke patients estimated with functional comprehensive assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用功能综合评定量表(functionalcomprehensiveassessment,FCA)在脑卒中患者入院(发病3周内)时和在病后6个月分别进行评估,研究早期康复对脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。方法:2001-11-27/2003-08-15在安徽医科大学附属医院神经内科连续入院,年龄在40~80岁的脑梗死或脑出血患者,病程不超过3周,共计80例。根据入院时间把所有符合研究要求的脑卒中患者按随机分组表入组,所有患者都接受传统的神经内科治疗。80例患者被随机分配到康复组和对照组,康复组除接收神经科治疗外,还需接收物理治疗和作业治疗,以及语言等治疗,每个患者都接受FCA量表评估。结果:76例患者完成研究,4例脱落。一般资料显示年龄、脑梗死和脑出血比例、性别等在治疗前,康复组与对照组差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。应用wilcoxon秩和检验把FCA总分分为≤40,41~60,61~80,>80,治疗前两组比较差异无显著性意义,但治疗后康复组FCA总分为≤40,41~60,61~80,>80的分别为3,7,9,20例,对照组分别为6,10,16,5例,两者比较差异有显著性意义(P=0.011)。结论:早期康复能够改善脑卒中患者的日常生活能力、运动功能。 AIM: Functional comprehensive assessment (FCA) was used to measure function of stroke patients (in three week after stroke) at admission and six months after stroke and study the influence of early rehabilitation intervention on functional outcomes of stroke patients. METHODS: Totally 80 patients with hemorrhagic and cerebral infarction aged between 40 and 80 consecutively admitted in the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, First Affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical University between December 2001 and August 2003 were chosen. The course was no more than three weeks.Eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group and rehabilitation group. Traditional neurology therapies were given to all patients. The rehabilitation group received physical and occupational therapy. In addition, the service of speech pathology was used. The functional status of each patient was assessed at both admission and six months later using FCA instrument. RESULTS: Totally 76 patients finished the study and 4 cases were missed. General data indicated there was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment(P >0.05) in ages, cerebral infarction, proportion of cerebral hemorrhage and sex. FCA total mark was divided into 4 levels:≤40, 41-60, 61-80, >80 using Wilcoxon rank test. There were no significant differences between the two groups before treatment . However, after treatment, total FCA scores were ≤40 (3 cases), 41-60 (7 cases), 61-80 (9 cases), >80 (20 cases) in the rehabilitation group and < 40 (6 cases), 41-60 (10 cases), 61-80 (16 cases), >80 (5 cases) in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups(P= 0.011). CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation intervention can obviously improve daily life ability and motor function of stroke patients.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期1-3,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
基金 国家"十五"攻关项目基金资助(2001BA703B21)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1吴毅,胡永善,范文可,杨晓冰,王倩.康复医学功能评定量表信度和效度研究[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(3):310-310. 被引量:46
  • 2缪鸿石.康复医学理论与实践[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001.1861.
  • 3孟兆祥,李厥宝,倪朝民.运动疗法在脑卒中偏瘫康复中的应用[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(7):1159-1159. 被引量:13
  • 4Johnstori MV, Wilkerson DL, Maney M. EvMuation of the quality and outcomes of medical rehabilitation programs//DeLisa JA, ed. Rehabilitation medicine: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1993:240 -68.
  • 5Ween JE, Alexander MP, D' Esposito M, et al. Factor predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996; 47:388 -92.
  • 6Alexander MP. Stroke rehabilitation outcome. A potential use predictive variables to establish levels of care. Stroke 1994: 25:128 - 34.
  • 7Klintsova AY, Greenough WT. Synaptic plasticity in cortical system. Curr Opin Neuro Biol 1999; 9:203 - 8.
  • 8Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: the willis lecture. Stroke 2000;31:223 -30.
  • 9Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Reorganization of neocortieal representatons after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke.Progr Brain Res 1987: 71: 249- 66.

二级参考文献9

  • 1南登昆.康复医学 第2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.92.
  • 2SEYMOUR DG,BALL AE,RUSSELL EM,et al. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities.The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2001,7(4):411.
  • 3HOBART JC,LAMPING DL,FREEMAN JA,et al. Evidence based measurement:which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation[J].Neurology,2001,57(4):639.
  • 4KUCUKDEVECI AA,YAVUZER G,ELHAN AH,et al. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):311.
  • 5DAVING Y,ANDREN E,NORDHOLM L,et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):301.
  • 6COHEN ME,MARINO RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81(12):21.
  • 7SCHINDL MR,FORSTNER C,KERN H,et al. Evaluation of a German version of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in acute and chronic stroke patients[J].Eur J Neurol,2000,7(5):523.
  • 8刘亚玲,高天,韩志慧.脑卒中偏瘫的康复治疗[J].中国康复,1999,14(1):45-46. 被引量:6
  • 9耿建国,戴爱华.综合康复疗法对缺血性脑卒中患者肢体运动功能的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2000,15(5):297-298. 被引量:13

共引文献59

同被引文献83

引证文献8

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部