期刊文献+

论赋学与楚辞学的分合

Regarding the Disintegration and Integration between the Rhyme Prose and the Songs of the South State
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对文本的编辑 ,文献目录对作品的分类收录以及古代文论对文体的分类评述等三方面考察 ,认为赋学与楚辞学自南朝萧梁时期开始分离 ,各自朝不同方向发展。同时 ,又通过分析楚辞学对骚赋的看法及赋学的“祖骚宗汉”说 ,认定二学虽分开而并未完全分离 ,其间自有相关的连结。因此赋学与楚辞学是既有区别又联系紧密的两门学问 。 By investigating the following three aspects-the compilation of the text,the classified records of the documentary catalogue and the classified commentary of the ancient Chinese literature theory,I draw a conclusion that the Rhyme Prose and the Songs of the South State had started to disintegrate and develop toward different directions since the Nanbei Dynasty.At the same time,by the research of the views of Saofu in the Songs of the South State and the versions of “Lisao and Hanfu as the Forefathers” in the Rhyme Prose,I firmly hold the view that the two sabgects have disintegrated but not absoluely.So there are not only differences between the Rhyme Prose and the Songs of the South State,but close connections as well.They are two essential parts to the history of Chinese literature criticism.
作者 王以宪
出处 《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2004年第6期41-46,共6页 Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 赋学 楚辞学 骚赋 “祖骚宗汉” Rhyme Prose Songs of the South State Saofu Lisao and Hanfu as the Forefathers
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]司马迁.史记[Z].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 2[2]洪兴祖.楚辞补注[Z].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 3[7]陈国庆.汉书艺文志注释汇编[Z].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 4[5]长孙无忌.隋书经籍志[Z].上海:商务印书馆,1955.
  • 5[6]程千帆.程千帆全集:卷三[C].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.
  • 6[1]郭绍虞.中国历代文论选[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
  • 7[2]周振甫.文心雕龙注释[Z].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
  • 8[4]朱熹.楚辞集注[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
  • 9[12]洪湛侯.楚辞要籍解题[Z].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1984.
  • 10[13]祝尧.古赋辩体[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1993.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部