期刊文献+

作格句的认知研究 被引量:2

A Cognitive Analysis of Ergative Sentences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作格句在英语中是一种特殊句式,在第二语言习得中较难掌握。文章首先回顾了作格动词的研究成果,然后总结出作格句的理想化认知模式,对成对作格动词所构成的作格句按状态变化梯度划分出三种,并对这三种作格句用图形/背景知识来做出认知上的解释。 Ergative sentences, as a special sentence pattern, are very difficult to master in second language acquisition. This paper tries to analyze them from the cognitive point of view. First some predecessors' researches on ergative sentences are presented. Then, the ICM of ergative sentences is proposed, and the ergative sentences containing paired ergatives are divided into three types according to the hierarchies of the change of state in subjects. Finally, the three types of ergative sentences are explained by using the figure/ground theory.
作者 白淑霞
机构地区 河南大学
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第6期55-57,共3页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
关键词 作格句 认知 理想化认知模式 图形/背景 ergative sentence cognitive ICM figure/ground
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Burzio, L. Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries[D]. Ph. D. dissertation. MIT. Revised as Burzio (1986), 1981.
  • 2[2]Croft William. Voice: Beyond Control and Affectedness[ A]. Barbara Fox, Paul J. Hopper ( ed. ) Voice: Form and Function [ C ].Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1993.
  • 3[3]Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. Second Edition. China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 4[4]Perlmutter, D. M. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative bypothesis[ A]. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society [ C ]. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1978.
  • 5[5]Randall et al. The Representation of Implicit and De the matized Subjects[ D ]. Doctoral Dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1994.
  • 6[6]Thompson, Geoff. Introducing Functional Grammar [M]. China: Foreigu Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 7[7]Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H. J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001.
  • 8[8]Wilkins, Wendy, ed. Syntax and Semantics: Thematic Relation [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1988.
  • 9[9]Yip, V. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. 1995.
  • 10蔡金亭.中国学生英语过渡语中的作格动词—一项实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(4):283-289. 被引量:51

二级参考文献19

  • 1董秀芳.述补带宾句式中的韵律制约[J].语言研究,1998(1):55-62. 被引量:66
  • 2Ackema, P. & M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and nonmovement[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173- 197.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding[M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1986. Barrier[M]. Cambridge, Mass: The MTT Press.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program[M]. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  • 6Epstein, S. D. 1984. Quantifier- pro and the LF representation of PRO [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 15:499 - 505.
  • 7Fagan, S.M.B. 1988. The English middle[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19:181 -203.
  • 8Hornstein, N. 1999. Movement and control[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69- 96.
  • 9Key, S.J. &T. Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416.
  • 10Larson, R. 1988 Onthe double object construction[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335- 391.

共引文献360

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部