期刊文献+

玉米整株根系水导与其表型抗旱性的关系 被引量:23

Relationship between Maize Root Hydraulic Conductivity and Drought Resistance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以一组遗传背景清楚、表型性状已知的玉米遗传材料杂交种户单 4号 (F1 代 )及其双亲 (♂ ,♀ )为供试材料 ,用PEG 6 0 0 0模拟干旱胁迫 (ψs=- 0 2MPa) ,在室内溶液培养条件下研究了玉米整株根系水导 (Lpwr)与其表型抗旱性间的关系。结果表明 ,玉米整株根系水导与其品种抗旱性间具有显著的正相关 (P <0 0 5 )。在干旱胁迫下 ,玉米叶片净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度、叶水势均随着整株根系水导的增加而直线增加。品种间相比 ,表型抗旱的杂交种户单 4号(F1 代 )整株根系水导最高 ,不抗旱的父本最小 ,同样抗旱的母本介于二者之间。叶片气体交换参数测定表明 ,水分胁迫下母本的气孔导度 (Cs)和蒸腾速率 (Tr)显著高于F1 代和父本。所以尽管母本的渗透势下降最多 ,可以通过维持较高的吸水和较强的渗透调节能力而抵御干旱 ,但由于其高的气孔导度 (即节流能力差 )而使植株水分状况最差 (低的叶水势 ) ,属于耐旱但低产型 (叶片光合速率显著低于其他两个品种 )。相反 ,F1 代由于高的整株根系水导和低的气孔导度 ,属于抗旱丰产型 ,在水分利用上具“开源节流”优势 ,其光合速率 (Pn)和水分利用效率在正常水分和水分胁迫处理下 ,均高于父母本。 Solution culture method was used to study the relationship between maize whole root hydraulic conductivity(Lp wr.) and drought resistance. The results indicated that for all the three maize genotypes, there was a significant positive correlation between Lp wr. and leaf ψ s, P n, T r and C s, which meant with the increase of Lp wr., the leaf parameters also increased, as a result, the plant water status was improved. Under both normal water supply and water stress by -0.2 MPa PEG, F 1 had a higher Lp wr., so that F 1 could maintain capacity of continually absorbing water from dry soil under water deficiency condition. At the same time, F 1 had a lower C s compared with other two genotypes, and could effectively reduce water transpiration under water deficiency. This capacity of exploring new source and blocking transpiration flow in water use maybe accounted for the F 1's higher drought resistance(respected by it's significant higher P n and WUE). However, under water deficiency, the female parent had a lower ψ s and higher osmotic adjustment ability than the two genotypes, resulting in its drought resistance.
出处 《作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期203-208,共6页 Acta Agronomica Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究专项经费 (G19990 1170 8) 国家自然科学基金项目 (3 0 170 5 5 9)资助
关键词 玉米 整株根系水导 表型抗旱 Maize Whole root hydraulic conductivity(Lp wr.) Drought resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1山仑.旱地农业技术发展趋向[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(7):848-855. 被引量:128
  • 2山仑 邹琦 王学臣 eds.Advances in improvement of crop drought resistance and water use efficiency[A].邹琦,王学臣,eds.作物高产高效的生理学进展[C].Beijing: Science Press,1994.258-268(inChinese).
  • 3慕自新,张岁岐,杨晓青,梁宗锁.氮磷亏缺对玉米根系水流导度的影响[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2003,29(1):45-51. 被引量:16
  • 4段舜山,谷文祥,张大勇,李凤民.半干旱地区小麦群体的根系特征与抗旱性的关系[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(2):134-138. 被引量:44
  • 5胡荣海 王缳 朱志华 In: 邹琦 王学臣 eds.Progress of studies on crop root characteristics and its draught resistance[A].In: 邹琦,王学臣 eds.作物高产高效的生理学进展[C].Beijing: Science Press,1994.269-275(inChinese).
  • 6胡荣海 景蕊莲 In: 娄成后 王学臣 eds.Physiological basis of draught resistant breeding[A].In: 娄成后,王学臣 eds.作物产量形成的生理学基础[C].Beijing: China Agriculture Press,1999.155-164(inChinese).
  • 7Steudle E. Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. J Exp Bot, 2000a, 51(special issue): 1 531-1 542.
  • 8Davies W J, Zhang J. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1991,42:55-76.
  • 9Carvajal M, Cooke D T, Clarkson D T. Responses of wheat plants to nutrient deprivation may involve the regulation of water-channel function. Planta, 1996,199:372-381.
  • 10Clarkson D T, Carvajal M, Henzler T, Waterhouse R N, Smyth A J, Cook D T,Steudle E. Root Hydraulic conductance: diurnal aquaporin expression and the effects of nutrient stress. J Exp Bot, 2000,51:61-70.

二级参考文献41

  • 1山仑,郭礼坤,徐萌,孙纪斌.干旱条件下钙与赤霉素混合处理种子的生理效应及增产效果[J].干旱地区农业研究,1994,12(1):85-91. 被引量:34
  • 2高音 林忠平.关于开发与利用耐旱基因资源的建议[J].专家建议,2000,7(145):57-57.
  • 3许旭日 诸涵素 等.叶面喷施腐殖酸对小麦临界期干旱的生理调节作用的初步研究[J].植物生理学报,1983,9(4):367-374.
  • 4[1]Barrowclough DE, Peterson CA, Steudle E(2000). Radial hydraulic conductivity along developing onion roots. J Exp Bot, 51:547-557
  • 5[2]Boyer JS(1985).Water transport. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 36:473-516
  • 6[3]Carvajal M, Cooke DT, Clarkson DT(1996).Responses of wheat plants to nutrient deprivation may involve the regulation of water-channel function. Planta, 199:372-381
  • 7[4]Clarkson DT, Carvajal M, Henzler T, Waterhouse RN, Smyth AJ, Cook DT,Steudle E(2000). Root Hydraulic conductance: diurnal aquaporin expression and the effects of nutrient stress. J Exp Bot, 51:61-70
  • 8[5]Forde B, Lorenzo H(2001). The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil, 232:51-68
  • 9[6]Hoarau J, Barthes L, Bousser A, Deleens E, Prioul JL(1996).Effect of nitrate on water transfer across roots of nitrogen pre-starved maize seedlings.Planta,200:405-415
  • 10[7]Li HB(李海波), Xia M(夏铭), Wu P(吴平)(2001). Effect of phosphorus deficiency stress on rice lateral root growth and nutrient absorption. Acta Bot Sin(植物学报),43:1154-1160(in Chinese)

共引文献185

同被引文献358

引证文献23

二级引证文献434

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部