期刊文献+

美中贸易收支与人民币汇率关系:实证分析 被引量:105

The U.S.-China Trade Balance and RMB's Exchange Rate: An Empirical Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对美中贸易收支与人民币汇率问题,经研究发现,汇率变动对贸易收支的影响是值得怀疑的,仅仅依靠人民币汇率变动是无法解决美中贸易逆差问题的。1994—2002年年度数据实证显示,美中贸易收支与人民币汇率(名义或实际汇率)之间没有稳定的关系;1998—2003年月度数据计量表明,美中贸易收支与人民币汇率之间没有长期稳定的协整关系。并且,依据美中两国月度统计数据计量的结论是相一致的。因此,“人民币升值论”或许更多的是基于政治而非经济因素,人民币汇率浮动并不能解决美中贸易逆差问题。 As to the relationship between U.S.-China trade balance and RMB's exchange rate, this study shows that it is uncertain whether the effect of exchange rate volatility on trade balance or not, and it is impossible to resolve U.S.-China trade deficit, depending only on the movement of RMB's exchange rate. The annual data during 1994-2002 shows empirically that there is no stable relationship between U.S.-China trade balance and RMB's exchange rate (nominal or real exchange rate). The monthly data during 1998-2003 shows econometrically that there are no long-run and stable cointegrating relationships between U.S. trade (imports, exports and trade balance) with China and RMB's exchange rate. Moreover, the conclusion derived from U.S. Census Bureau monthly data is consistent with that from China National Statistical Bureau monthly data. Therefore, the argument on RMB's appreciation is based upon political factors in great degree rather than economic factors. It is impossible to resolve U.S.-China trade deficit issues with an attempt to have RMB's exchange rate floated.
作者 沈国兵
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期43-47,共5页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(04CJY021)" 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No.35)
关键词 美中贸易收支 人民币汇率 单位根检验 协整检验 U.S.-China trade balance, RMB's exchange rate, unit root test, cointegration test.
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1谢建国,陈漓高.人民币汇率与贸易收支:协整研究与冲击分解[J].世界经济,2002,25(9):27-34. 被引量:274
  • 2蒙代尔.一个经济学家的一生:兼论人民币汇率政策[N].上海证券报,2003(4).
  • 3中国国务院.关于中美贸易平衡问题[EB/OL].http://www.china.org.cn/ch-book/maoyi/imaoyi.htm.,1997.
  • 4姚枝仲.美国的贸易逆差问题[J].世界经济,2003,26(3):12-15. 被引量:63
  • 5Davis, Donald and David Weinstein. The Mystery of the Excess Trade Balances [J] . American Economic Review AEA Papers and Proceedings, May 2002, 92 (2) , pp.170-174.
  • 6Greenspan, Alan. Greenspan: Pricier Yuan won' t help US trade deficit [EB/OL] . December 2003, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-12/12/content_289670.htm.
  • 7Eckaus, Richard. Should China Appreciate the Yuan[R] . MIT Department of Economics: Working Paper Series Working Paper 04-16, January 15, 2004, pp.l-19.
  • 8U S -China Economic and Security Review Commission or USCC. 2004 Report to Congress[R] . One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, June 2004, http://www.uscc.gov, pp.4-37.
  • 9Zhaoyong Zhang. The Exchange Value of The Remninbi And China' s Balance of Trade: An Empirical Study [R] . NBER Working Paper No.5771, September 1996, pp.1-23.
  • 10Yingfeng Xu. China' s exchange rate policy [J] . China Economic Review, 2000 , (11) , pp.262-277.

二级参考文献14

  • 1罗伯茨(2001).《抉择—关于自由贸易与贸易保护主义的寓言》,中国人民大学出版社、北京大学出版社.
  • 2Feldstein,Martin(1993): "The Dollar and the Trade Deficit in the 1980s: A Personal View", NBER Working Paper, No.4325.
  • 3Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogoff (1994): " The Intertemporal Approach to the Current Account ", NBER Working Paper, No. 4893.
  • 4Bernanke, B. ( 1986 ) : " Alternative Explanations of the Money-income Correlation," Carnegie-Rochster Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 25, Autumn, 49-99.
  • 5Enders, W. ( 1995 ) : Applied Economics Times Series, John Wiley & Sons, Now York.
  • 6Gall, Jordi(1992):"How Well Does the IS-LM Model Fit Postwar U. S. Data?" Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2) :709-38
  • 7Heilke, W. 1. , and P. Hooper, 1987. The U. S. Deficit in the 1980s .-An Empirical Analysis. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systerm, International Finance Discussion Papers, No.304.
  • 8Johansen, S. (1988) : Statistical Analysis of Cointergration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12: 231-254.
  • 9Juselius, K. (1992):Domastic and Foreign Effects on Pricesin an Open Economy: The Case of Denmark. Journal of Policy Modeling 14 (4): 401--428.
  • 10Krugman,A. O. and R. Baldwin, (1987) : The Persistence of the U.S. Trade Deficit. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

共引文献333

同被引文献724

引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部