两种类型五级语义量词的赋值差值比较

Study on evaluating-diversity of two kinds of five-rating qualifiers

目的:探讨五级语义量词赋值差值的规律,为心理 测量误差的数量化研究提供科学的计算方法.方法:165名士 兵对发生频率和症状水平两组五级语义量词进行赋值,分析 赋值差值的分布特征、组内各词赋值差值及高中组和初中组 赋值差值之间的差异程度.结果:两组词的赋值差值都呈正偏态分布,两组词的赋值差值之间没有显著性差异;组内各词 赋值差值差异显著(P<0.05);高中组和初中组被试赋值差 值之间差异不显著.结论:语义量词赋值差值大小呈正偏态 分布,两类词的赋值之间有一定的一致性;词与词之间赋值区 间宽度差异较大;学历不影响赋值区间宽度.

AIM: To discuss the distributing role of evaluating-diversity of five-rating qualifiers and to assess its use in the evaluation for psychological measurement error.METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five soldiers were requested to designate values for two groups of five-rating qualifiers,most of whom were senior or junior high school graduates.The distributing characteristics of the evaluating-diversity were analyzed.The difference of the evaluating-diversity of each qualifier in each of the two groups and the difference between the senior or junior high school graduates were assessed.RESULTS: The evaluating-diversities between the two groups assumed positive skew distribution.There was no significant difference between the two groups.The evaluating-diversities between the words in each group had significant difference.There was no significant difference between those designated by senior school group and junior school group.CONCLUSION: The evaluating-diversities of qualifiers assume positive skew distribution.The evaluating-diversities between qualifiers have certain consistency.There is significant difference between evaluating-diversity intervals in words.Educational level has no obvious effects on evaluating-diversity interval.