期刊文献+

WHOQOL-BREF在广泛性焦虑症患者中应用的信度及效度研究 被引量:39

Reliability and Validity of the WHOQOL-BREF in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估世界卫生组织生命质量测定量表简表在广泛性焦虑症病人中的信度和效度。方法:由专业医生对42例符合CCMD-3广泛性焦虑症诊断标准的门诊初诊患者评定世界卫生组织生命质量测定量表简表、健康状况调查问卷、汉密顿焦虑量表和大体评定量表,在治疗第四周予以重测。对量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度、平行效度及经验效度等指标进行分析。结果:WHOQOL-BREF的Guttman分半信度为0.767,Cronbach'sα系数为0.827,各维度的Cronbach'sα系数较好,重测后各项目的相关系数均在0.348~0.646之间;WHOQOL-BREF的生理、心理、社会关系和环境分量表与SF-36多数分量表呈显著相关,WHOQOL-BREF的生理、心理、社会关系和环境分量表与GAS评分呈显著正相关;广泛性焦虑症患者的焦虑症状评分与WHOQOL-BREF的多个分量表分呈显著性负相关,经治后广泛性焦虑症患者生命质量及焦虑症状均有显著性的改善,具有统计学意义。结论:WHOQOL-BREF具有较好的信度和效度,能较全面地评价广泛性焦虑症患者生命质量。 Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Quality Of Life Questionnaire abbreviated version(WHOQOL-BREF) in patients with generalized anxiety disorder(GAD). Methods: 42 outpatients meeting the GAD criteria of CCMD-III were rated with WHOQOL-BREF,the Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) and Global Assessment Scale(GAS) by professionals. At the fourth week after treatment, these patients were assessed again. Results: The Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.767, and the Cronbach α coefficient was 0.827. It covered a good coefficient of inter-item consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient).The coefficients of test-retest for all subscales of WHOQOL-BREF were ranged from 0.348 to 0.646. The subscales of WHOQOL-BREF were significantly related with the major subscales of SF-36. The four subscales of WHOQOL-BREF were significantly relative with GAS. Most subscales of WHOQOL-BREF were significantly and negatively correlated with the mood statuses of these patients. After treatment, the quality of life in patients with GAD had a significant improvement. Their improvement degrees were significantly and positively correlated with the reduced scores of HAMA and many of its factors. Conclusion: The results indicated that the Chinese version of WHOQOL-BREF has relatively good reliability and validity, and is one of the standard tools for comprehensive assessment of the quality of life of patients with GAD.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2005年第1期37-39,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 上海高校优秀青年教师后备人选科研项目(项目号:03YQHB048)
关键词 广泛性焦虑症 患者 生命质量 测定量表 信度 焦虑症状 效度 系数 专业 结论 Generalized anxiety disorder WHOQOL-BREF SF-36 Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张骏,何廷尉,罗德儒,刘朝杰,陈芙君,袁鸿江.SF-36评价中风患者生命质量的信度和效度[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(5):416-419. 被引量:58
  • 2李春波,何燕玲.健康状况调查问卷SF-36的介绍[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2002,29(2):116-119. 被引量:578
  • 3盛承东,王祖承,李春波,方华.健康状况调查问卷应用于精神分裂症患者中的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(3):151-153. 被引量:46
  • 4方积乾 李彩霞 郝元涛 等.世界卫生组织生存质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)中国版的制定[J].统计与预测,1998,:40-41.
  • 5张作记.行为医学量表手册[Z].,2001.122-123.
  • 6Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, et al. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire :a new measure. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1993, 29(2):321-326
  • 7Mendlowicz MV, Stein MB. Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry, 2000, 157 (5):669-682
  • 8WHO. The development of WHO quality of life assessment instrument. Geneva, WHO, 1993
  • 9McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York : OxfordUniversity Press, Inc,1996. 230
  • 10Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000, 25(24):3130-9

二级参考文献14

  • 1肖水源.社会支持评定量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7:42-42.
  • 2袁鸿江,老年医学,1995年,52页
  • 3肖水源,中国心理卫生杂志,1993年,7卷,增刊,42页
  • 4李凌江,杨德森,胡治平,文芳.慢性脑卒中患者生活质量评估工具的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1997,6(1):4-7. 被引量:30
  • 5Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-from health survery (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 1992, 30: 473
  • 6范肖冬.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,77
  • 7Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, et al. The effects of pain severity on health-related quality of life.: a study of Chinese cancer patients. Cancer, 1999, 86(9) : 1848
  • 8Ren XS, Chang K. Evaluating health status of elderly Chinese in Boston. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51(5) : 429
  • 9Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36Health Survery Questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 1992, 305: 160
  • 10Ware JE. Health status and outcomes assessment tool. The Intenation Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2000, 3 : 138

共引文献650

同被引文献494

引证文献39

二级引证文献353

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部