摘要
《国画》中的朱怀镜是一个走失在"官道"上的迷路人,游戏在情场上的负心汉,彷徨于心迹历程的可怜人。而《梅次故事》将朱怀镜塑造成一个"清官",一个负责任的丈夫,一个坚守了自我的正人君子。前后简直判若两人,何以会发生如此大的变化呢?运用文本分析以及心理学、社会学等其他一些研究方法,对《国画》和《梅次故事》进行深入的分析,追本溯源,可知这种角色的改变其实源自创作主体内心的变化。
In Traditional Chinese Painting, Zhu Huaijing is depicted as a loser who gets lost on the government-financed road, an irresponsible lover who juggles in love affairs, and a poor fellow who wanders in the course of true-state of mind. While in Mei Ci's Story, he is molded as an honest and upright official, a responsible husband, a man of moral integrity who sticks to himself. He is quite a different person in these two novels. Why is he so different in two works? By carrying on deep analysis of Traditional Chinese Painting and Mei Ci's Story with the use of such research approaches as text analysis and psychological sociology, etc. , we will know the change of this kind of role actually stems from the change of the creative innermost of author.
出处
《湘南学院学报》
2004年第6期70-74,82,共6页
Journal of Xiangnan University