期刊文献+

历史撰述的批判与总结——王鸣盛论史书体裁与体例的利弊得失 被引量:2

Wang Mingsheng's View on the Format of History Books:A Critical Summary
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国古代杰出的史学评论家 ,无不重视对历史撰述的得失进行批判和总结。作为乾嘉史学名家之一 ,王鸣盛在探讨历史撰述问题时 ,尤其注意考察史书体裁的利弊得失 ,帝纪与人物传记体例的灵活运用 ,以及书志与论赞体例的进一步完善等问题 ;同时他又能够联系具体史事和作者撰述思想来讲体例 ;既重视体例又强调不应为体例所拘 ,反映其朴素辩证的变通思想 ,值得我们深入研究 ,并加以继承和发展。 Almost every prominent historians in ancient China paid much attention to criticizing and concluding the gain and loss about writing of historical works. Wang Mingsheng, as one of the most outstanding representative characters of the Qianjia School, especially attached much importance to this point.As he researched writing of historical works, Wang not only put stress on flexible exertion of biographic styles about emperors and other historical characters, but also dedicated to the improvement on the methods of historical writing such as Shu, Zhi, Lun and Zan. At the same time, he also made use of concrete historical facts and historians writing thoughts to discuss the structures of historical works. Whats most important and valuable is that Wang not only emphasized the structure of historical works but also insisted not to be confined by it, that reflected his simple dialectic and flexible methods. So it is because of those that whats done by him is still worth studying, inheriting and developing up to the present.
出处 《史学史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期30-37,共8页 Journal of Historiography
关键词 史书体裁 体例 王鸣盛 乾嘉 史学评论 人物传记 史事 得失 朴素 批判 Wang Mingsheng Shi Qi Shi Shang Que Writing of Historical Works Styles of Historical Works Structures of Historical Works
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1赵翼.廿二史札记[M].北京:中华书局,1984..
  • 2明史.北京:中华书局,1974:2343,1784.
  • 3辽史.北京:中华书局,1974年10月第1版,2003.
  • 4[4]金史[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
  • 5[1]史通通释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978.
  • 6[7]全祖望.鲒埼亭文集选注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1982.
  • 7[10]梁启超全集(第5册)[M].北京:北京人民出版社,1999.
  • 8.新五代史[M].北京:中华书局,1974..
  • 9王鸣盛.十七史商榷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1958..
  • 10.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975..

共引文献8

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部