期刊文献+

CAPPS1和CAPPS2数值预报模式对比分析 被引量:10

Contrast Between CAPPS1 and CAPPS2 Numerical Prediction Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对CAPPS1模式和CAPPS2模式预报广西污染物进行了对比分析。主要对比了其污染扩散原理、气象预报模式、操作系统、运行时间、预报时效及预报效果。分析表明 :CAPPS1和CAPPS2模式对各种污染物预报的相关系数均在 0 4 4以上 ,两种模式预报广西空气污染都是可行的 ;两种模式均对SO2 的预报效果最好 ,NO2 次之 ,PM 10相对最差 ;CAPPS2模式对各种污染物的预报值与实测值相关系数均比CAPPS1高 ,其中NO2 的相关系数提高幅度最大 ;CAPPS2模式对NO2 和PM10的预报准确率比CAPPS1偏高 ,而对SO2 的预报准确率比CAPPS1偏低 ;CAPPS2预报首要污染物正确率比CAPPS1高出 11个百分点 ,而预报首要污染物等级正确率则高出 9个百分点。 A contrast analysis of CAPPS1 and CAPPS2 prediction models for Guang Xi air quality was conducted, including their pollutant diffusion theories, weather forecasting models, operating systems, run time, and valid time. It is concluded that both CAPPS1 and CAPPS2 models have a correlation coefficient of over 0 44 for all kinds of pollutants, and both models are applicable to air quality forecasts in Guang Xi and have the best prediction precision on SO 2, the second on NO 2 , while PM10 prediction is relatively worse. CAPPS2 has higher correlation coefficients for all pollutants than CAPPS1 with the highest on NO 2. In contrast to CAPPS1, CAPPS2 has higher prediction precision on NO 2 and PM10 and lower prediction precision on SO 2. The prediction precision of CAPPS2 on chief pollutant is 11 percent higher than those of CAPPS1, and 9 percent higher for grade prediction.
作者 李雄
出处 《气象科技》 北大核心 2004年第6期414-416,424,共4页 Meteorological Science and Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1徐大海,朱蓉.国家标准GB/T3840-91中城市大气污染物总量控制A-P值法的应用[J].城市环境与城市生态,1993,6(2):36-41. 被引量:13
  • 2高书然 李郁竹.空气污染的天气形势分析和预防[J].气象,1982,(1):33-35.
  • 3预报试验小组.北京空气污染气象条件的预防试验[J].气象,1981,(11):25-28.
  • 4崔波 王建捷 等.MM5在国家气象中心CRAY-C92的实时预报试验尝试.下一代数值天气预报业务系统的开发及应用[M].北京:国家气象中心,2000.225-236.
  • 5国家技术监督局 国家环境保护局.GB/T3840-91制定地方大气污染物排放标准的技术方法[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1991..
  • 6PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and User Guide: MM5 Modeling System Version 3, Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division National Center for Atmospheric Research. January 2001.
  • 7Reisner J, Rasmussen R M. Bruintjes R T. Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Qurt. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 1998, 124: 1071-1107
  • 8Dudhia J. A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State-NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,1993, 121: 1493-1513
  • 9Hsie E Y, Farley R D, Orville H D. Numerical simulation of ice-phase convective cloud seeding. J. Appl. Meteor.,1980, 19(8): 950-977
  • 10Lin Y L, Farley R D, Orville H D. Bulk parameterization of the snowfield in a cloud model.J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,1983, 22(6): 1065-1091

共引文献77

同被引文献60

引证文献10

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部