摘要
以规则为导向的世界贸易组织协议,为了保障各成员国切实履行国际义务,部分协议中设立了各国的司法审查义务。司法审查尺度作为司法审查深度的外在标准,反映了司法权对行政权的干预程度。在遵守《反倾销协议》司法审查原则性要求下,美国和欧盟的司法审查实践都体现了对行政行为的充分尊重。而中国有关的反倾销司法审查法律法规,却采用了十分严格的合法性审查标准。鉴于反倾销的专业性和特殊性,目前我国的反倾销司法审查尺度不宜过深,应该更加灵活化。
Based on rules and principles, WTO has established in part of its agreements the judicial inspection system in order to enable every member country to fulfill their duty. The criteria of judicial inspection as the ulterior criteria reflect the extent of interference of judicial laws into administrative behavior. Under the law of Anti - dumping Agreement, American and EU show enough respect to administrative behavior in Judicial inspection. While in China, the situation is quite different. Due to the professionalism and specialty, the inspection criteria should be flexible instead of being profound.
出处
《政法学刊》
2004年第4期6-8,共3页
Journal of Political Science and Law