科学与治理的兴起及其意义被引量：35

The emerging of science and governance and its meaning

下载PDF

导出

摘要 “科学与治理”(scienceandgovernance)议题在近年来日益引起国际政策界和学术界的广泛关注和深入研究,正在成为一个蓬勃发展的前沿课题。本文以发达国家经验为基础,分析了“科学与治理”兴起和发展的动因,把其核心内容归纳为:制度化的咨询、信息公开和预防原则、公众参与以及对研究的规范。科学与治理的兴起表明,要使科学技术对人民生活和社会发展长期有益,一个国家科学技术的发展战略与政策就不再只是包括科学和创新两方面的内容,还要加入第三个因素———“社会”或“公众”,实现科学技术、经济和社会三者的协调发展。 The issue of science and governance has attracted the community of policy and academic research during recent years and is growing as a front topic, which is driven by the fundamental change of the relationship of science and society .This paper examined the dynamics of science and governance ,and described the main factors as advice, precautionary principle , public participation and research control .The paper highlighted the meaning of science and governance.

作者樊春良

机构地区中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期7-13,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70373073)

关键词科学与治理科学与社会科学咨询公共参与预防原则 science and governance science and society science advice public participation precautionary principle

分类号 G301 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学科学文献出版社,2002,2,4.130.
2.Select Committee on Science and Technology．科学与社会[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,.57-58,77.
3刘兵,李正伟.布赖恩·温的公众理解科学理论研究:内省模型[J].科学学研究,2003,21(6):581-585. 被引量：35
4龚旭.我国生命科学研究中的伦理与法律问题——第180次香山科学会议综述[J].中国科学基金,2002,16(4):231-234. 被引量：5
5Commission of the Euopean Communities. European Governance- A White Paper[ R ]. Brussels ,2001.7.25.
6European Commission. Science and Society Action Plan[ R ]. 2002.
7S Jasanoff. Science and governance: the US experience[ J ]. The IPTS Report on Science & Governance,2000,54(6).
8The British Council. Science and society: towards a democratic science[ R]. 2001.3.
9N Morris. Vial bodies: conflicting in the move to new institutional relationship in biological medicines research and regulation [ J ]. Research Policy,2000,29 ( 2 ) :2.
10Funtowicez S, et al. Science and governance in the European Union : a contribution to the debate[ J]. Science and Public Policy ,2000, ( 10 ).

二级参考文献7

1[1]Wynne B. May the sheep safely graze? a reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide[A]. Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B. Risk, Environment and Modernity:Towards a New Ecology[C]. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1996. 65.
2[2]Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science[J]. Public Understand Science, 1992,(1):283-304.
3[3]Michael M. Ignoring science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science[A]. Irwin A, Wynne B. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology[C]. Cambridge University Press, 1996. 109.
4[4]Wynne B. Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity[J]. Public Understand Science, 1993,(2):321-337.
5[5]International Conference of Science & Technology Journalists (ICSTJ-TOKYO 2001). Seeking Trends in Science & Technology Journalism for the 21st Century[DB/OL]. http://www.fest.org.za/scicomm/docs/icstj.pdf. 2003-06.
6[6]Wynne B. Public understanding research: new horizons or mirrors?[J]. Public Understand Science, 1992,(1):37-43.
7[7]Gregory J, Miller S. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility[C]. New York: Plenum Trade, 1998. 101.