期刊文献+

颈动脉内膜剥脱术前、术中、术后颅内外血流动力学变化的研究 被引量:24

Extracranial and intracranial hemodynamic change before, during and after carotid endarterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究颈动脉内膜剥脱术 (CEA)前、术中、术后颈动脉及颅内动脉的血流动力学变化。方法 用彩色多普勒血流成像 (CDFI)和经颅多普勒超声 (TCD)对 2 7例CEA患者术前术后病变局部管径、流速及同侧大脑中动脉 (MCA)术前、术中、术后流速、搏动指数 (PI)和交通支开放情况进行分析。结果 CEA术后 ,颈动脉管径、血流速度恢复正常。患侧的MCA流速及PI升高 (P <0 .0 0 1)。侧支循环关闭。术中患侧MCA流速下降幅度 <40 %与前交通开放相关 (P =0 .0 15 )。结论 CEA后颅外和颅内动脉的血流动力学恢复正常。CDFI与TCD结合 ,可评价CEA患者术前、术中、术后颅内外动脉的血流动力学变化 ,为CEA手术提供可靠的客观依据 ,并可作为评价手术效果的有效方式。 Objective To study the extracranial and intracranial arterial hemodynamic changes before, during and after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods Color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) were used to examine the diameter and velocity of the stenotic area of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), and the velocity and pulsatility of ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) and collateral circulations respectively before, during and after CEA. Results After CEA, the diameter and velocity of extracranial ICA returned to normal. The velocity and pulsatility of ipsilateral MCA increased significantly ( P <0.001), and the established collateral circulation were closed. During the operation, the decrease of MCA velocity less than 40% was in correlation with the opening of anterior communicating artery (AcoA) ( P = 0.015 ). Conclusion After CEA, the extracranial and intracranial arterial hemodynamic parameters return to normal. Combined with TCD, CDFI is effective in evaluating the extracranial and intracranial arterial hemodynamic changes.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 2004年第12期1872-1874,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 内膜切除术 血流动力学 超声检查 颈动脉狭窄 Endarterectomy Hemodynamics Ultrasonography Carotid stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis:gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference [J]. Radiology, 2003, 229 (2): 340-346.
  • 2Zwiebel WJ. Introduction to vascular ultrasonography[M]. 4th ed. USA:WB Saunders Company, 2000, 54-65.
  • 3Hoksbergen AW, Legemate DA, Csiba L, et al. Absent collateral function of the circle of Willis as risk factor for ischemic stroke[J].Cerebrovasc Dis, 2003,16(3): 191-198.
  • 4Muller M, Hermes M, Bruckmann H, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of collateral blood flow in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion: correlation with cerebral angiography[J] . Am J Neuroradiol, 1995,16(1) :195-202.
  • 5郑宇,华扬,凌晨,段春,张蕾,王力力,刘玉梅,周瑛华.颈动脉严重狭窄或闭塞对颅内循环的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(6):901-903. 被引量:48
  • 6Gossetti B, Martinelli O, Guerricchio R, et al. Transcranial Doppler in 178 patients before, during, and after carotid endarterectomy[J]. J Neuroimaging, 1997,7(4) :213-216.
  • 7Muller M, Behnke S, Walter P. Cerebrovascular resistance and blood flow velocity changes after carotid endarterectomy[J]. Vasa, 1999,28(4) :279-282.
  • 8Blohme L, Pagani M, Parra-Hoyos H, et al. Changes in middle cerebral artery flow velocity and pulsatility index after carotid endarterectomy[J]. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1991,5(6):659-663.
  • 9Dalman JE, Beenakkers IC, Moll FL, et al. Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy helps to identify patients at risk of postoperative hyperperfusion[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1999,18(3) :222-227.
  • 10Nielsen MY, Sillesen HH, Jorgensen LG, et al. The hemodynamic effect of carotid endarterectomy[J]. Eur J Endovasc Surg,2002, (24): 53-58.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[2]North American Symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials collaborators: beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991,325(7) :445-453.
  • 2[3]European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial European Carotid Surgery Trial:Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99 %) or with mild(0-29 %) carotid stenosis [J]. Lancet, 1991,377 (8752):1235-1243.
  • 3[5]Vernieri F, Pasqualetti P, Matteis M, et al. Effect of collateral blood flow and cerebral vasomotor reactivity on the outcome of carotid artery occlusion[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(7):1552-1558.
  • 4[7]William J, Zwiebel. Introduction to vascular ultrasonography[M].4th edition. US: W B Saunders Company, 2000. 54-65.
  • 5[9]Hartkamp MJ, van der Grond J, van Everdingen KJ, et al. Circle of Willis collateral flow investigated by MRA[J]. Stroke, 1999,30(12): 2671-2678.
  • 6[10]Ringelstein EB, Weiller C, Weckesser S. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity is significantly reduced in low-flow as compared to thromboembolic infarctions:the key role of circle of Willis[J]. J Neurol Sci, 1994,121(1) :103-109.
  • 7[11]Van Everdingen KJ, Visser GH, Klijn CJM, et al. Role of collateral flow on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with unilateral internal carotid occlusion[J]. Ann Neural, 1998,44(2): 167-176.
  • 8[12]Hedera P, Bujdakova J, Traubner P. Effect of collateral flow pattern on outcome of carotid occlusion[J]. Eur Neural, 1995,35(4) :212-216.
  • 9[1]Timsit SG, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, et al. Early clinical differentiation of cerebral infarction from severe atherosclerotic stenosis and cardioembolism[J]. Stroke, 1992,23(4) :486-491.

共引文献47

同被引文献251

引证文献24

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部