中法刑事再审程序比较研究

Comparative Study on Criminal Retrial Procedure of China and France

当前对中国刑事诉讼制度的研究,有必要观察和研究其他国家刑事诉讼制度一些有益的经验。从再审制度的建立理念、基本规定、启动方式和原审法院地位等几个方面的问题比较了中法再审制度各自的特点。两国再审制度有许多相似之处,同时也存在明显的差异;在再审制度重构时,立法者应端正诉讼理念,消除再审制度中的一些非理性规定,包括取消法院自行启动再审程序的权力,终止检察机关再审抗诉的特殊地位,正确定位原审法院在再审程序中的特殊角色等。

It is necessary to study criminal procedure systems of other countries when we study ours. This article studies the characteristics of Chinese and French retrial procedure in the way of established idea, basic formulation, starting pattern and position of original court. The author thinks that; there are obviously some similarities and differences between the two countries, so when reconstructing the retrial procedure, legislators should rectify procedural idea, eliminate irrational formulations, such as, abolishing courts power of starting retrial procedure on itself; stopping the special status of procuratorial departments accusation; properly orientating the special role of original court in retrial procedure.