摘要
20 0 3年的刘涌案给我们留下了许多遗憾与思考。其中 ,关于北京部分法学专家应刘涌辩护律师之邀而做出的专家论证意见书引起了轩然大波 ,关注此案的学人纷纷从学术道德、人品及该案对司法独立与公正的影响等各个方面进行了分析与论证。本文试图从宪法上赋予公民的言论自由权利的角度来阐述专家意见书的性质 ,其对司法独立的影响以及如何平衡该两种价值。
So many people ponder over the case of Liuyong, meanwhile, regard it as a pity. Thereinto, the position paper of some experts in law from Beijing who were invited by the counsel of the defence caused the bomb damage.People analyze and argue on this case from the angles of learning morality,moral quality,and the infection to the independence and the impartiality of justice.This article tries to elaborate the quality of the position paper of experts in law from the aspects of the liberty of speech which is endowed by the constitutional law and the relationship between the liberty of speech and the independence of justice.
出处
《四川教育学院学报》
2004年第11期9-11,共3页
Journal of Sichuan College of Education
关键词
专家意见书
言论自由
司法独立
专家论证
中国
the position paper of experts
the liberty of speech
the independence of justice