期刊文献+

基于传输路径的RANDP部署策略(TPBDS)

Transfer-path-based Deployment Strategy (TPBDS)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 设计了支持RSVP协议动态部署的RSVP主动网络部署包(RANDP)及其封装格式,提出了两种RANDP包的部署策略,即点到点的部署策略EEDS和基于传输路径的RANDP部署策略TPBDS。对两种RANDP包部署策略的带宽消耗做了定量分析。分析表明,一般情况下,在RSVP协议部署过程中,采用TPBDS策略比采用EEDS策略要节省带宽。 In this paper, the RSVP active network deployment packet (RANDP) supporting RSVP dynamical deployment and its encapsulation format are designed. Two RANDP deployment strategies, i.e., the end-to end deployment strategy (BEDS) and the transfer-path-based deployment strategy (TPBDS), are proposed. The bandwidth consumption of these two strategies in RSVP deployment is analyzed quantitatively. A comparison shows that in general case TPBDS consumes less bandwidth than BEDS during the RSVP protocol deployment.
出处 《计算机工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期45-47,共3页 Computer Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(69973036 90104022)
关键词 主动网络 服务质量 ANEP RSVP Active network Quality of service ANEP RSVP
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Jackson A W, Sterbenz J P G, Condell M N, et al. SENCOMM Architecture. http:∥www.ir.bbn.com/projects/sencomm/,2000-04-26
  • 2Wetherall D, Legedza U, Guttag J. Introducing New Internet Services:Why and How. IEEE Network, 1998,(3):12-19
  • 3Calvert K L. Architecture Framework for Active Networks Version 1.0. http:∥www. dcs.uky.edu/~calvert/arch-docs.html, 1999-07-27
  • 4Peterson L. NodeOS Interface Specification. http:∥www. dcs.uky.edu/~calvert/arch-docs.html,2001-01-10
  • 5Alexander D, Braden B, Gunter C, et al. Active Network Encapsulation 0Protocol(AN EP) .http:∥www.cis.upenn.edu/~switchware/AN EP/docsANEP.txt, 1997-07

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部