期刊文献+

关于秦桧归宋的讨论 被引量:9

A Discussion on Qin Hui's Return to the Song Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于秦桧归宋 ,虽无详实的历史记录 ,但一般史家都认定是作为奸细由金人纵归。近年有学者对此提出异议 ,认为秦桧是逃归宋朝。本文对此进行商榷 ,认为研究历史忌讳孤证 ,尤其不能回避与自己论点相悖的史料 ,持此说者仅以陆游《老学庵笔记》为证 ,而回避其他史料与论证 ,在运用史料等方面也存在问题 ,因而不能令人信服。 With reference to Qin Hui's return to the Song Dynasty it is generally believed that he was released by the Jin Court on purpose as a spy, although there are no reliable historical records. This view has been challenged in recent years by some scholars, who believe that Qin Hui escaped from the Jin to the Song Dynasty. This paper discusses this problem. It is suggested that in discussing historical problems one should not cling to single pieces of evidence and, in particular, should not deliberately sidestep historical data bearing evidence contrary to his own belief. Those who believe that Qin Hui was released by the Jin Court have their evidence only in Pen Notes in Laoyue Hut by Lu You, the poet of the Song Dynasty, and deliberately dodge other historical materials and evidence. Therefore, their argument is not convincing. In addition, their methodology is open to question.
作者 王曾瑜
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期166-172,共7页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1《两宋史研究汇编·秦桧的亲友》,台湾联经出版事业公司,1987年,第145页.
  • 2《<老学庵笔记>中所见的秦桧》,《岳飞研究》第4辑,中华书局,1996年.
  • 3《南宋史稿》,杭州大学出版社,1999年,第81-83页.
  • 4中华书局标点本.《老学庵笔记》前言注1.
  • 5《三朝北盟会编》卷176.
  • 6.《建炎以来系年要录》卷87[M].,.第1445页.
  • 7《建炎以来系年要录》卷152绍兴十四年十一月乙丑.
  • 8《宋宰辅编年录校补》卷15.
  • 9《建炎以来系年要录》卷38建炎四年十月辛未注.
  • 10《金史》卷24《地理志》.

共引文献15

同被引文献69

引证文献9

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部