期刊文献+

钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿归属考——从明代陈侃《使琉球录》谈起 被引量:14

An Investigation of the Ownership of Diaoyu Island and Its Surrounding Isles——An Inquiry Starting from Notes on Mission to Liuqiu by Chen Kan of the Ming Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿的主权问题 ,在现今的中日关系中存在争议。1 53 4年中国明代琉球册封使陈侃上呈的《使琉球录》中 ,便对中琉疆界作有明确记载 ,后世中、日、琉球三国的政府官员、学者乃至岛民水夫亦皆以为是。这充分证明 :钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿原本便是中国领土 ,历史记载的古米山 (现今的久米岛 )才是古代琉球王国的西部疆土。“古人日以远 ,青史字不泯”。只有尊重历史 。 Sovereignty over Diaoyu Island and its surrounding isles remains under contention in present day relations between China and Japan. A clear cut description of the boundary between China and Liuqiu in Notes on Mission to Liuqiu was in fact presented to the Ming Court in 1534 by Chen Kan,Title\|conferring Envoy of the Ming Dynasty. This was later recognized by officials and scholars of China, Japan and Liuqiu as well as residents and sailors on the islands. This fully demonstrates that Diaoyu Island and the surrounding isles have been Chinas territory from ancient times. The western bound of the Kingdom of Liuqiu was marked by what the documents refer to as Mount Gumi (the present Jiumi Isle). As a Chinese poem puts it, “Long years have passed/But the written record stands witness.” Only by respecting history can we understand and resolve the present dispute.
作者 米庆余
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期182-189,共8页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈侃.《使琉球录》,商务印书馆,1937年,第24—30页.
  • 2宫诚荣昌.《琉球历史》.吉川弘文馆,1977年,第83页.
  • 3高桥庄五郎.《尖阁列岛笔记》.日本:青年出版社,第201页.
  • 4徐恭生著.《中国·琉球交流史》.西里喜行等译,ひるき社,1991年.第19页.
  • 5蔡铎本.《中山世谱》.冲绳县教育委员会,1973年影印本,第175-176页.
  • 6《中山王府相卿传职年谱·位阶定》序,日本法政大学冲绳文化研究所,1986年.
  • 7大城立裕.《冲绳历史散步》铭文插图.创元社,1991年.第45页.
  • 8蔡铎本.《中山世谱》,第141页.
  • 9蔡温.《中山世谱》,《琉球史料丛书》(4),名取书店,1941年.第24页.
  • 10桑江克英译注本.《球阳》,三一书房,1971年,第17页.

共引文献1

同被引文献304

引证文献14

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部