摘要
侵占罪中遗忘物应该区分于遗失物。两者的文义不同是区分的原因之一 ,立法者在立法过程中也有意将两者加以区分 ,台湾地区的侵占罪立法体例提供了将两者区分的可资以借鉴的法律传统。将遗忘物与遗失物加以区分的实质在于对不同财物的侵占体现了不同的社会危害性。将两者加以区分也体现了刑法谦抑性的价值理念。
Forgotten things ought to be differed from the missed things in crime of occupa tion.One of the causes is their differences in literal meaning.In legislating procedure,the legislator intentionally made a difference between them.The pat tern of crime of occupation of Taiwan may give us a clue to understand the diffe rences.Occupying forgotten things has a greater harm to the society than occupy ing missed thing.Differing from forgotten things to missed things complies with the principle of criminal law.
出处
《河北法学》
2002年第5期153-156,共4页
Hebei Law Science
