期刊文献+

“恶意诉讼”的社会危害性及对策 被引量:16

Litigation with Evil Intention":Social Harms and Countermeasures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公民法律素质迅速提高 ,权利意识不断强化 ,在公民通过诉讼途径保护合法权益的意识逐步增强的同时 ,公民借助诉讼这一合法的外在形式谋取不正当利益或者损害他人利益的动机同样得到了“强化” ,“恶意诉讼”现象已经成为一个不容人们忽视、亟待解决的问题。分析“恶意诉讼”的社会危害性并提出对策。 With the rapid improvement of legal diathesis and the growing right consciousness, more and more citizens protect their legal rights and interests t hrough litigation, at the same time the motivation to acquire malfeasance benefits and other harm benefits through litigation having been also intensified. 'Litigation with evil intention' has become a problem that can not be neglected and should be solved as quickly as possible. Harms to the society of 'litigation with evil intention' are expo unded along with countermeasures.
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《河北法学》 2002年第5期32-34,共3页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 恶意诉讼 社会危害性 公民 不正当利益 民法 权利意识 法律素质 途径 对策 动机 litigation with evil intention right consciousness countermeasu res
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1C.D.Baker.Tort(3rd ekition).Sweet & Maxwell 1981.p.295.
  • 2Danby V.Beardsley(1880)43 L T.603.
  • 3Fitzjohn V,Mackinder(1861)4 L.T.149.
  • 4C,Christie Surn & Substance of Tort.CES 1980.p.298
  • 5Salroond &Henston.Law of Torts (19th edition) Sweet & Maxwell 1987.p.469.
  • 6Stevens v Midland Counties Railway Co(1854)10 Ex.352.
  • 7Sahoond & Henston.law of Torts P.446.
  • 8Hicks v .Faulkner (1878)8 Q.B.167.171.
  • 9Basebe v .Mathews(1867)L.R.2C.P684.16 L.T.417.
  • 10Boaler v .Holder(1887) 3 T.L .R .546.

共引文献72

同被引文献108

引证文献16

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部