期刊文献+

儿童汉语中的限制焦点 被引量:13

Restrictive focus in child Mandarin
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代语言学研究的一个重要领域是自然语言的焦点结构。焦点结构复杂、抽象,它所表达的意义远远超出了句子的字面意义,给习得带来困难。本研究讨论儿童语言中的限制焦点。我们通过看图判断句子正误的实验,考察了说汉语的儿童对汉语中限制焦点助词“只”与“就”的理解。实验结果表明,四至六岁儿童一般忽略限制焦点助词的分布,他们对主语前“只/就”和动词前“只/就”的理解完全相同。这一结果与研究人员对说英语的儿童限制焦点的发展的观察基本一致。说汉语的儿童倾向于将汉语的限制焦点理解为表谓语焦点。其主要原因有二:(1)谓语焦点结构与自然语言信息表达的非标记性结构(即主题-述语结构)同构;(2)汉语的主题突出性以及汉语量词的特点也可能影响说汉语的儿童对限制焦点的理解。 An important area in contemporary linguistic research is focus. Focus structures are highly abstract and complicated and pose learnability problems in their acquisition. The present research explores Mandarin-speaking children's interpretation of restrictive focus. A truth-value judgment experiment has been conducted to investigate children's understanding of restrictive focus particles ZHI and JIU in Mandarin Chinese. The results show that four-to-six-year-old children tend to associate the restrictive focus particle with the predicate, no matter whether it occurs in pre-subject or preverbal positions. This suggests an early acquisition of predicate-focus structures for Mandarin-speaking children. It is argued that this has to do with the isomorphic mapping between the predicate-focus structure and the topic-comment pragmatic structure of languages on the one hand, and the topic-prominence property and the superiority of adverbial quantifiers over determiner quantifiers of Mandarin Chinese on the other.
作者 杨小璐
机构地区 清华大学外语系
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期225-237,共13页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 清华大学骨干人才计划的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Baker, C. 1979. Syntactic problem and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10:533-581.
  • 2Baker, C. and McCarthy, J., eds., 1981. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Cambridge,MA.: MIT Press.
  • 3Beilin, H. 1975. Studies in Cognitive Basis of Language Development. New York: Academic Press.
  • 4Bergsma, W. 1999. Children's interpretation of Dutch sentences with the focus particle alleen. Paper presented at GALA'99(Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), September 10- 12, 1999,University of Potsdam, Germany.
  • 5Borer, H. and Wexler, K. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper and E. Williams, eds.,Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • 6Chafe, W. 1976. Giveness, constrativeness, definiteness, subjects, topic, and point of view. In C. Li, edl.,Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
  • 7Chormsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • 8Chormsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
  • 9Clark, E. V. 1971. On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10:266- 275.
  • 10Crain, S., Philip, W., Drozd, K.F., Roeper, T. and Matsuoka, K. 1992. Only in Child Language.Unpublished manuscript. University of Connecticut and University of Massachusetts.

二级参考文献53

  • 1刘丹青.语义优先还是语用优先──汉语语法学体系建设断想[J].语文研究,1995(2):10-15. 被引量:77
  • 2张伯江,方梅.汉语口语的主位结构[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1994,31(2):66-75. 被引量:42
  • 3陈平.试论汉语中三种句子成分与语义成分的配位原则[J].中国语文,1994(3):161-168. 被引量:220
  • 4Emerson, H. 1979. Children's comprehension of 'because' in reversible and non-reversible ~ntences. Journal of Child Language 6: 279-300.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. 1975a. Pragmatic ,scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6 (3):353-375.
  • 6Fauconnier,1975b. Polarity and the scale principle. Chicago Linguistic Society 11:188-199.
  • 7Fauconnier, 1978. Implication reversal in a natural language. In F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • 8Foley, C. A.. 1996. Knowledge of the Syntax of Operators in the Initial State." the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in French and English. Doctoral dissertation. Comell University.
  • 9Gelman, R. 1978. The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
  • 10Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA.: M IT Press.

共引文献522

同被引文献223

引证文献13

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部