摘要
格鲁肯斯等人的语用解释方案未能充分考察照应修正中交际双方的认知心理过程 ,而建立在可及性理论基础上的认知解释方案恰恰能够充分揭示照应修正中指称词语选择的认知心理根源。对照应修正的认知可及性分析表明 ,照应修正本质上是较低可及性标示语对较高可及性标示语的修正 ,而交际双方在对所指实体可及性地位的判断上的差异是导致照应修正产生的根本原因 。
The pragmatic interpretations of anaphoric repair proposed by Geluykens and Huang have neglected the cognitive and psychological characteristics of interlocutors in the process. However, the cognitive interpretation in the light of Accessibility Theory can appropriately reveal the cognitive and psychological origin of anaphoric repair. Studies in this connection have shown that anaphoric repair is in nature a repair from a lower accessibility marker to a higher accessibility marker, and that the cause for the repair is the discrepancy between the speakers assumption and the listeners assessment of the accessibility status of the referent. A Cognitive & Pragmatic Model of anaphoric repair can be established.
出处
《解放军外国语学院学报》
北大核心
2002年第6期5-8,共4页
Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词
照应修正
指称词语
可恢复性
可及性理论
anaphoric repair
referring expression
recoverability
accessibility theory
