期刊文献+

中外刑事赔偿归责原则之比较研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study on Chinese and Overseas Attribution Principles for Criminal Compensations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 世界上多数国家对司法裁决错误的赔偿 (冤狱赔偿 )采用无过失责任原则 ,而对非司法裁决错误的职务侵权赔偿采用过错或者违法原则。我国没有区分这二者的区别 ,采用的是以违法责任为主兼采无过失责任的归责原则体系。要完善刑事赔偿归责原则 ,应借鉴其他国家的立法经验。 Most states over the world adopt attribution principle of non-negligence in compensations for erroneous judgments, and attribution principle of negligence or breach of law in compensations for duty torts resulting from non-judicial rule mistakes. There is no difference between them in China, who mainly adopts attrition principle system of breach of law, and non-negligence principle at the same time. China should learn legislative experiences from other countries for perfecting Chinese attribution principle of criminal compensations.
作者 周樨平
出处 《河北法学》 2003年第1期129-133,共5页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 归责原则 刑事赔偿 司法裁决 违法原则 违法责任 无过失责任原则 职务侵权 世界 国家 借鉴 criminal compensations attribution principles breach of law comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献45

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部