期刊文献+

反内幕交易法的公平性基础——从内幕交易“无损害”假说谈起 被引量:1

On the Fairness of Anti-Inside Trading Legal System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内幕交易是否违反法律的公平 ,多有争议。内幕交易“无损害”是反对以法律方式禁止内幕交易的逻辑起点。本文在介绍无损害性假说并对之提出针对性的批判之后 ,循着“以人为中心的公平”的论证体系 ,对内幕交易的不公平性作了分析 ,为反内幕交易法的公平性基础提供了新的理论构架。 There are different opinions about the relationship between insider trading and the legal fairness. It is the logical base of anti-insider trading law that whether insider trading is victimless crime or not. This essay analyses and displays the unfairness of insider trading according to the social relationships between insiders and outsiders after introducing and criticizing the Hypothesis of Victimless Crime. Therefore, this essay puts forward a new method which can sufficiently illustrate the fairness of anti-insider trading law.
作者 胡光志
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第4期126-132,共7页 Modern Law Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1武永生.[D].西南政法大学,2002.
  • 2胡柏年.内线人员交易:反驳无损害人罪行(Victimless Crime)之假说[J].证券市场发展季刊,:118-130.
  • 3Norman S. Douglas. The case against 'Victimless Crime' Hypothesis[J]. The Financial Review Vol. 23, No. 2 (May 1988)127-142.
  • 4Frank Esterbrook. Insider Trading , Secret Agents , Evidentiary Privileges , and the Production of Information [J]. Supreme Court Review. 1981. 323-326.
  • 5Stephen Bainbridge. the Insider Trading Prohibition : A Legeal and Ecnomic Enigma[J]. 38 University Florida Law Review 1986. 35.
  • 6杨清筠.公司内部人员证券交易之研究[D]. 台北: 238.
  • 7贺绍奇. 内幕交易的法律透视[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2000. 157.
  • 8胡光志.反内幕交易法律制度的经济根源[J].现代法学,2001,23(6):67-72. 被引量:5
  • 9See Chiarella v. United States, 445 U. S. 222 (1980); Dirks v. SEC, 463 U..S. 646 (1983).

二级参考文献17

  • 1贺绍奇. 内幕交易的法律透视[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2000. 157.
  • 2[台]武永生.证券市场内线交易之研究[D].74.
  • 3See Henry Manne. Insider Trading and Stock Market[M]. pp93-110. pp131 - 145(1966).
  • 4同上.p110.
  • 5See Jacqueline A. C. Suter. The Regulation of Insider Dealing in Britain[M]. Butterworths, London and Edinburgh. p32(1989).
  • 6See Henry Manne. Insider Trading and Stock Market[M]. p115(1966).
  • 7See Jacqueline A. C. Suter. The Regulation of Insider Dealing inBritain[M]. Butterworths, London and Edinburgh. p33(1989).
  • 8同上.
  • 9同上.20
  • 10See Hsiu - kwang Wu. An Economist Looks At Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934[J]. Columbia Law Rev , Vol. 68 , p262(1968).

共引文献6

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部