期刊文献+

中国英语学习者反身代词习得中的迁移作用 被引量:28

Preliminary study on transfer effects in the acquisition of English reflexives
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究以Schachter ( 1 983)的迁移理论为基础 ,探究中国英语学习者能否利用汉语反身代词和英语反身代词的相同约束特征来促进该习得过程。结果表明 ,中国英语学习者在对英语反身代词的约束特征构建假设时 ,极有可能依赖汉语反身代词的约束特征 ;母语迁移见于中国英语学习者习得英语反身代词的整个过程 ,并且这种迁移既有正迁移的一面 ,也有负迁移的一面。同时 ,这一习得过程不排除受普遍语法牵引的可能。 The study examines the transfer effects of L1 in the acquisition of English reflexives with reference to Chinese English learners. Particularly this study investigates how Chinese English learners utilize knowledge of the binding properties of Chinese reflexive ziji and taziji as a basis for the acquisition of target binding properties. The present study adopts the cognitive view on transfer (Schachter 1983), which conceptualizes transfer as a learning strategy in a general process of hypothesis construction and testing. The findings of the present study suggest that Chinese English learners could resort to L1 knowledge to form hypotheses about the target binding properties. L1 transfer is likely to exist in the whole acquisition process of English reflexives and it can produce both positive and negative effects. It seems that both L1 knowledge and UG constrain the acquisition process.
作者 李红
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第2期116-124,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bennett, S. & L. Progovac. 1994. Interaction between morphological complexity of reflexives and agreement in developing grammars [A]. In S. Avrutin, S.Franks & L. Progovac (eds.). Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics [C], Vol. 2. Ann Arbor, MI:Michigan Slavic Publications, 69-118.
  • 2Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 3Cole, P., G. Hermon & L. -M. Sung. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 21:1-22.
  • 4Eckman, F. 1994. Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition [A]. In E. Tarone, S.Gass & A. Cohen (eds.). Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition [C]. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum, 207-225.
  • 5Finer, D. & E. Broselow. 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexives binding [J]. NELS 16: 154-168.
  • 6Hirakawa, M. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives [ J ]. Language Research 6: 60-85.
  • 7Lakshmanan, U. & Teranishi. 1994. Preferences versus grammaticality judgements: Some methodological issues concerning the governing category parameter in second-language acquisition [A]. In E. Tarone, S.Gass & A. Cohen (eds.). Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition [C]. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum, 185-206.
  • 8MacLaughlin, D. 1998. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers [A]. In M. Beck, (ed.). Morphology and Its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge [ C ].Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 9Manzini, M. R. & K. Wexler. 1987. Parameters,Binding Theory, and Leamability [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413-444.
  • 10Progovac, L. 1992. Relativized SUBJECT: Long-distance reflexives without movement [ J ]. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 671-680.

共引文献2

同被引文献403

引证文献28

二级引证文献363

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部