期刊文献+

英语学生的元认知与学习时间分配策略 被引量:22

The metacognition and strategy of study-time allocation among English learners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了英语专业学生的元认知对其学习时间分配策略的影响。研究由三个互为印证的实验组成,结果表明当受试没有足够时间学习所有学习项目时,他们把比较多的时间分配在由元认知判断为易学的项目而不是难学的项目上,测验期待对这一策略的影响尤其明显;当学习材料较短时,受试分配较多学习时间给难学的项目;在较强的时间压力下,受试倾向于学习易学项目,而在中等时间压力,学习项目的趣味性对学习时间分配策略有明显影响。研究得出初步结论认为学习者使用元认知指导自己的学习过程,元认知指导下的策略在控制学习进程发挥作用。本文最后讨论了与元认知和学习策略的研究范式有关的问题。 The present research investigated the effects of metacognition on the strategy of study-time allocation among English learners in China. Three experiments were conducted to corroborate their findings each other. It was indicated that when subjects had insufficient time to learn all items they allocated more time to the judged-easy items than to the judged-difficult items on the basis of their metacognitive judgments, test expectancy had a strong effect on such strategy particularly. When the learning materials were shorter, they allocated more time to the more difficult items. Under the high time pressure, the subjects preferred to learn the easy items, whereas, under the moderate time pressure, the judged interest of the learning materials influenced the strategy of study-time allocation significantly. The research elicited a preliminary conclusion that learners the metacognition to guide their learning processes and the metacognitive strategies functioned in controlling learning processes. The relevant questions in the research paradigm for metacognition and learning strategies were also discussed.
作者 卢植
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第4期396-407,共12页 Modern Foreign Languages
关键词 元认知 英语专业学生 学习者 学习策略 指导 目的 期待 趣味性 倾向 学习过程 Metacognitio, time-allocation, learning strategy, discrepancy-reduction model
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Anderson, R. 1982. Allocation of attention during reading. In Discourse Processing, ed. A. Flammer & W. Kintsch. New York: North Holland.
  • 2Atlinson, R.C. 1970. Optimizing the learning of a second language vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Pyschology 96:124-129.
  • 3Cull, W.L. & E.B. Zechmeister. 1994. The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory resesrch: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners? Memory and Cognition 22:249-257.
  • 4Dweck, C.S. 1996. Capturing the dynamic nature of personality. Journal of Research in Personality 30:348-362.
  • 5Dunlosky, J. & C. Hertzog. 1997. Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science 52:178-186.
  • 6Dunlosky, J. & C. Hertzog. 1998. Training program to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves.In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Dunlosy, J. Dunlosky & A.C. Craesser. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • 7Dunlosky, J. & T.O. Nelson, 1992. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning and the delayed judgments of learning effect. Memory and Cognition 20:374-380.
  • 8Dunlosky, J. & T.O. Nelson. 1994. Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning to the effects of various study activities depend on when the judgments of learning occur? Journal of Memory and Language 33:545-565.
  • 9Dunlosky, J. & T.O. Nelson. 1997. Similarities between the cue for judgments of learning and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of judgment of learning accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language 36:34-49.
  • 10Flavell, J.H. 1979. Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34:906-911.

共引文献96

引证文献22

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部