期刊文献+

离散还是连续?——语义信息加工性质的实验研究 被引量:2

DISCRETE OF CONTINUOUS?──THE DYNAMICS OF SEMANTIC INFORMATION PROCESSING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过两个行为实验 ,采用句子核证作业 ,将SAD技术和普通反应时实验有机地结合起来 ,对语义信息加工的性质进行了详细的考察。实验一采用普通反应时实验 ,探讨了语义信息加工机制的性质 ,结果表明 ,在熟悉度、语义距离和快慢反应时之间存在复杂的交互作用 ,说明在语义信息加工中存在两种不同性质的加工机制 ,熟悉性是影响这两种不同性质加工机制的因素。实验二采用SAD技术 ,研究熟悉性对语义信息加工性质的影响。结果表明 ,在高熟悉句中的部分信息积累具有离散的趋势 ;而低熟悉句中的部分信息积累则是连续的 ,进一步证明了两种性质加工机制的存在。结论认为 :语义信息加工中存在着两种性质的加工 :离散性加工机制和连续性加工机制 ,熟悉性是影响二者关系的一个重要因素。 The present study focused on the dynamics of semantic information processing, and the role of familiarity. In order to solve this problem, two experiments with speed-accuracy decomposition and conventional reaction-time paradigm were conducted to inspect how dose familiarity influence the dynamic of semantic processing. Experiment 1 used conventional reaction-time paradigm with sentence verification task to investigate the effects of familiarity and semantic hierarchical distance on time course of semantic process. The results showed there are complex interaction among familiarity, semantic hierarchical distance and percentile of reaction time. It provides evidences consistent with the dual-process mechanism in semantic processing. This mechanism combined discrete search and continuous computation. Experiment 2 used SAD technique with the sentence verification task. The aim of experiment 2 was to explore the familiarity effect on the available partial information accumulations of discrete search and continuous computation mechanisms. The results showed that the high familiarity sentences verification process produced discrete intermediate outputs of partial information; and the process of low familiarity produced continuous intermediate outputs of partial information.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2001年第5期398-404,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家攀登项目资助 (项目号 :95 -专 -0 9)
关键词 语义加工 速度-正确率分离范式 部分信息积累 离散加工 连续加工 semantic information process, speed-accuracy decomposition paradigm, partial information accumulation, discrete search, continuous computation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Collins, Quillian. Retrieval timefrom semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8:240-247
  • 2Smith E E, Shoben E J, Rips L J. Structure and process in semantic memory: Afeatural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 1974, 81:214-241
  • 3Anderson J R. Retrieval of information from Long-term memory. Science, 1983, 220.25-30
  • 4Kounios J, Elizabeth C, Roderick W. Semantic memory and the granularity of semanticrelations: Evidence from speed-accuracy decomposition. Memory and Cognition, 1994,22:729-741
  • 5Meyer D E, Yantis S, Osman A M, Smith J E K. Temporal properties of humaninformation processing: Tests of discrete versuscontinuous models. Cognitive Psychology,1985, 17:445-518
  • 6Miller J. Discrete and continuous models of human information processing:Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica, 1988, 67:191-257
  • 7Kounios J, Roderick W. Speed-accuracy decomposition yields sudden insight intoall-or-none information processing. Acta Psy- chologica, 1995, 90:229-241
  • 8MeyerDE, IrwinDE, OsmanAM, KouniosJ, The dynamics of cognitive and action mentalprocesses inferred from speed-accu-racy decomposition, Psychological Review, 1988,95:183-237
  • 9Kounios J, Meyer D E. Structure and process in semantic memory: New evidence basedon speed-accuracy decomposition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1987,116:3-25
  • 10Kounios J. Process complexity in semantic memory. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1993,19: 338-351

二级参考文献1

共引文献2

同被引文献70

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部