期刊文献+

无语境条件下汉语词类歧义词的意义激活 被引量:14

MEANING ACTIVATION OF CHINESE SYNTACTIC CATEGORY AMBIGUOUS WORDS IN ISOLATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以单字词为实验材料 ,采用启动命名任务 ,在孤立词条件下考察了汉语词类歧义词不同意义激活的时间进程特点。实验发现 ,歧义词的两种意义都能被激活 ,但主要意义激活得较早 ,次要意义激活速度较慢 ;当两种意义都激活之后 ,次要意义的激活水平降低 ,而主要意义仍维持在一定激活水平。结果表明 。 Understanding the nature of lexical access for ambiguous words has been the aim of many psycholinguistic studies in the past two decades. The principle issue concerns whether all meanings of an ambiguous word are activated at the same time or ordered and selective access is led by meaning frequency and context. In lexical decision task, Zhang et al. (1999) had found that meaning access of Chinese homographs is mainly affected by the relative frequency of meanings, and referential sentence context had no effect on the access of homograph's subordinate meaning. Using a primed naming task, the present study examined the time course of meaning activation of Chinese syntactic category ambiguous words in isolation In four SOAs (43, 84, 200 and 400ms), subjects named target single character words that were semantic related to the more frequent or less frequent meaning of an ambiguous single character prime. The results showed that two meanings of ambiguous words were both activated, with the dominant meaning retrieved earlier than the subordinate meaning. After initial activation, the less frequent meaning became less active, while the dominant meaning maintained a high level of activation. It was suggested that relative frequency played an important role in the multiple activation process of Chinese syntactic category ambiguous words.
作者 武宁宁 舒华
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2001年第4期305-311,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金 ( 60 0 830 0 5 )资助项目
关键词 词类歧义词 意义激活 相对频率 时间进程 汉语 syntactic category ambiguous words, meaning activation, relative frequency, time course, Chinese.
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Sereno S C. Resolution of lexical ambiguity: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21(3):582-595
  • 2Simpson G B. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbalBehavior, 1981, 20(1) :120-136
  • 3Duffy S A, Morris R K, Rayner K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27:429-446
  • 4Simpson G B, Burgess C. Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psycholo-gy: Human Perception and Performance, 1985, 11(1): 28-39
  • 5Boland J E. Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 36(4) :588-615
  • 6Frazier L, Rayner K. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities:Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 1987,26(5) :505-526
  • 7MacDonald M C. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 1993, 32(5) :692-715
  • 8Tanenhaus M K, Leiman, J M, Seidenberg M S. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18: 427-440
  • 9Seidenberg M S, Tanenhaus M K, Leiman J M, Bienkowski M.Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context:Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14:489-537
  • 10Gernsbacher M A, Faust M. The role of suppression in sentence comprehension. In: G B Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland, 1991. 97-128

共引文献8

同被引文献270

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部