摘要
文艺美学的学科定位和性质问题 ,自该学科于 2 0世纪七八十年代获得命名以来一直存在歧见。把文艺美学作为美学或文艺学的下属分支学科 ,从所谓“一般美学”和“一般文艺学”的逻辑预设出发对文艺美学的定位、性质及相关问题进行简单逻辑推演和学术克隆的作法是不可取的。文艺美学是在美学与文艺学两大学科长时期的相互渗透、融合基础上产生的一个具有交叉性、综合性的新兴文艺研究学科。交叉性决定了文艺美学与某些传统的美学理论和文艺理论在对象、内容甚至体系架构上的某些一致性或重复性 ,同时也决定了这一新兴学科在学科生成和理论生长中的综合性。以学科交叉为基础 ,在研究对象、理论内容、研究方法等方面走综合创新之路 。
There are different views about discipline orientation and nature of literary and artistic aesthetics since this discipline was named in 1970s-1980s. This paper does not agree the argument that regarding the literary and artistic aesthetics as a branch of aesthetics or literature & arts and, thus, the orientation, nature and other questions of literary and artistic aesthetics are deduced with simple logic and are simply copied academically from the beforehand presumed starting point that the literary and artistic aesthetics is a “ordinary aesthetics” or a “ordinary literature & arts”, what this paper approved is that the literary and artistic aesthetics is a new discipline having overlapping and comprehensive nature developed from a long time's mutual infiltration and mergence between the two disciplines of aesthetics and literature & arts. The overlapping property determines that literary and artistic aesthetics is somewhat unanimous and coincident with some traditional aesthetics theories and theories of literature & arts in object, content even structure of discipline, at the same time, it also determines that this new discipline is comprehensive in its origination and theoretical development. Based on the overlapping property, the advantages and turn point of literary and artistic aesthetics are to take a way to bring forth new ideas in discipline object, theoretical content and studying method.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第3期40-45,共6页
Literature,History,and Philosophy