期刊文献+

20世纪英国世袭贵族的衰落 被引量:5

The Fall of the British Hereditary Peerages in the 20th Century
原文传递
导出
摘要 It had been a long time since the struggle launched by the Liberal Party and the Labour Party and progressive force which were against the privileges of the British hereditary peerages.However,little effects have been achieved during such a long period.Around 1999,once again the Labour Party carried out a parliamentary reform.The privileges of attending and voting in the House of Lords of all the hereditary peers have been deprived.On the other hand, this success seemed to have been achieved easily when the conditions changed.Since the 1880s,the decline of the political privileges of the nobility had made the function of the British hereditary lords weaker and weaker.The collapse of the traditional huge estates made them lose their economic basis.And the change of the composition of peerage in the Upper House is another basic reason for the successful reform of the Labour Party. It had been a long time since the struggle launched by the Liberal Party and the Labour Party and progressive force which were against the privileges of the British hereditary peerages.However,little effects have been achieved during such a long period.Around 1999,once again the Labour Party carried out a parliamentary reform.The privileges of attending and voting in the House of Lords of all the hereditary peers have been deprived.On the other hand, this success seemed to have been achieved easily when the conditions changed.Since the 1880s,the decline of the political privileges of the nobility had made the function of the British hereditary lords weaker and weaker.The collapse of the traditional huge estates made them lose their economic basis.And the change of the composition of peerage in the Upper House is another basic reason for the successful reform of the Labour Party.
作者 阎照祥
出处 《世界历史》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期14-24,共11页 World History
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1哈纳姆.《19世纪宪制(J.Hanham ed.The Nineteenth Century Constitution 1815-1914),剑桥大学出版社,1969年版.第181—184页.
  • 2扬.《英国历史文件(G.M.Young ed.,English Historical Documents,Ⅻ(2),1874-1914),伦敦1977年版.第157-159页.
  • 3克里门特·艾德礼.《走向社会主义的意志和道路,商务印书馆,1964年版.第22、56页.
  • 4朗福德勋爵.《上院史(Lord Lorgford, A History of the House of Lords),伦敦1988年版,第166页.
  • 5安东尼·桑普森.《最新英国剖析,中国社会科学出版社,1984年版.第38页.
  • 6斯坦沃斯和吉登斯:《英国社会精英和权力》 P. Stanworth and A. Giddens, Elites and Power in British Society,剑桥大学出版社,1974年版,第36页.
  • 7庞尼特.《英国政府和政治(R.M.Punnett,British Government and Politics),芝加哥1988年版,第297页.
  • 8史密斯.《1815-1911年英国政治和社会生活中的上院》,E. A. Smith, The House of Lords in British Politics and Society 朗曼公司1992年版,第180页.
  • 9明格.《乡绅:一个统治阶级的兴衰》,G. E. Mirtgay, The Gentry, The Rise and Fell of a Ruling Class ,朗曼公司1978年版.第59页.
  • 10明格.《18世纪英国农业社会(G.E.Mingay, English Landed Society in the 18^th Century).朗曼公司,1963年版,第22—24页.

共引文献1

同被引文献11

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部