期刊文献+

论规约意象意义 被引量:8

On Conventional Imagery Meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与形式语义学不同 ,认知语法认为 ,意义并不是句子的真值条件 ,而是与句子有关的概念化过程 ,在本质上等于概念化或心智经验。本文基于 Langacker的《认知语法》等相关论著 ,阐释、分析了规约意象意义 ,类化、总结了其特征。规约意象意义指谓的是 ,说话人在心智上以不同方式构建所思考之场景的能力 ,具体分为 :加细程度、假设和期待、结构凸显、述义的比例和辖域以及视角。对规约意象意义的研究和探讨具有重要的语言学理论意义和不容忽视的教学应用意义。 Different from formal semantics, cognitive grammar suggests that the meaning of a sentence is not its truth-conditions, but the conceptualization related to it, being equal to conceptualization or mental experience in nature. Based on Langacker's monographs and theses concerning cognitive grammar, the paper analyzes and explicates conventional imagery meaning, as well as its categories and features. Conventional imagery meaning subsumes level of specificity, assumptions and expectations, salience of structures, scale and scope of predictions and perspective. The paper suggests that study of conventional imagery meaning is significant both in theory and in practice.
作者 王相锋
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《外语教学》 北大核心 2002年第2期3-8,共6页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 认知语法 规约意象意义 概念化 述义 cognitive grammar conventional imagery meaning conceptualization predication
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Cruse, D. Alan. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics[M]. Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 2Frawley, William. Linguistic Semantics [M]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1992.
  • 3Langacker. R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Vol. Ⅰ [M]. California, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 4Langacker, R. W. (1988a). An Overview of Cognitive Grammar[A]. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed). Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1988.
  • 5Langacker, R. W. (1988b). A View of Linguistic Semantics [A]. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed). Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1988.
  • 6Langacker, R. W. (1988c). A Usage-Based Model[A]. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed). Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1988.
  • 7Langacker, R.W. Concept, Image, and Symbol: the Cognitive Basis of Grammar[M]. Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter. 1990.
  • 8Langacker, R. (1991a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. Ⅱ[M]. California, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
  • 9沈家煊译.国外语言学,1991,(4).
  • 10Langacker, R. Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter,1999.

共引文献226

同被引文献65

  • 1沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:177
  • 2李曙英.名词所有格结构中的语义关系分析[J].沙洲职业工学院学报,2003,6(2):37-40. 被引量:2
  • 3伍谦光.语义学导论[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1997..
  • 4.牛津高阶英汉双解词典[Z].北京:商务印书馆,1997,7..
  • 5[8]陈建生.常用英语词汇辩析[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,1997.
  • 6[1]Langacker. R.W. Foundation of Cognitive Grammar[M]. Stanford University Press 1999.
  • 7[2]Langacker. R.W. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1999.
  • 8[3]F. Ungerer and H. J. Schmid. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2001.
  • 9[4]John Lyons. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction[M]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2000.
  • 10[1]Langacker R W.Concept,Image and Symbol:The Cognitive Basis of Grammar[M].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,1991.

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部