期刊文献+

代词强化标记主位与非强化标记主位 被引量:1

Pronominally Reinforced Marked Themes and Unreinforced Marked Themes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从代词强化标记主位和非强化标记主位的概念分析入手 ,归纳出它们在语篇中的五大功能 ,即呈现、连接、对比、强调和文体功能 ,并对这两种结构在语篇中的分布及在句法上的不同进行了对比 ,得出二者在书面语篇及口语交际中都具有重要价值。 Beginning with the analysis of the concept of PRMTs and UMTs, the author generalizes in this paper five main functions of PRMTs and UMTs in text, they are representative, connective, contrastive, emphatic and stylistic functions. The author also makes an analysis to the differences of the two structures in textual distribution and syntactic structure. The conclusion is that the use of the two structures has a major value in both written text and spoken communication.
作者 王嫦娟
出处 《外语教学》 北大核心 2002年第2期28-33,共6页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 代词强化 标记主位 语篇功能 语篇分布 pronominal reinforced marked theme textual function textual distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chafe, W. Givenness. contrastiveness, definiteness.subjects, topics, and points of view[A]. Li (ed.).Subject and Topic[C]. New York: Academic Press,1976.
  • 2Firbas, J. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis [J]. Travaux linguistics de Prague. 1964 (1):267-80.
  • 3Friedman, L. The manifestation of subject, object.and topic in American Sign Language[A]. Li (ed.).Subject and Topic[C]. New York: Academic Press,1976.
  • 4Givon, T. On Understanding Grammar[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. [M]. London: Edward Arnold.1994.
  • 6Jackendoff, R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar[M]. Cambridge: Mass. MIT Press, 1972.
  • 7Kies, D. Marked Themes with and without Pronominal Reinforcement: their meaning and distribution in discourse[A]. EH. Stiner & R. Veltman (eds). Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches [C]. London: Pinter Publishers Limited,1988.
  • 8Leech, G. N. & Short, M.H. Style in Fiction[M].New York: Longman Group Limited. 1981.
  • 9Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. A Communicative Grammar of English [M]. New York: Longman Group Ltd,1975.
  • 10Lyons, J. Semantic Theory[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:176
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2289

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部