部落联盟模式、酋邦模式与对外战争问题被引量：8

Early Regimes and External Wars

导出

摘要 Professor Xie Weiyang is well known for his theory of the origins of the state.He argues there are two patterns to the state,one of which is through the chiefdom,resulting in despotism,and another,through the confederacy of tribes,typically existed ever in the Iroquois society,resulting in democracy.He believes the main causes for the former pattern are the external wars,as shown in the history of the Aztec,and for the latter pattern are the peaceful activities,as proved by the histories of Greece and Rome. The author examined the same cases and a dosen’t agree with Prof.Xie’s point of view.The reasons are as follows:1.The Iroquois,Athenians,Spartans and Romans are not peaceful peoples,as believed by Xie Weiyang,and there are full of external wars in their processes of evolution.2.The regime of the Aztec is not a despotic one,but a democratic one,or,at least,a non despotic one.Therefore,the forms of early regimes are not necessarily connected with the facts whether external wars have ever happened. Professor Xie Weiyang is well known for his theory of the origins of the state.He argues there are two patterns to the state,one of which is through the chiefdom,resulting in despotism,and another,through the confederacy of tribes,typically existed ever in the Iroquois society,resulting in democracy.He believes the main causes for the former pattern are the external wars,as shown in the history of the Aztec,and for the latter pattern are the peaceful activities,as proved by the histories of Greece and Rome. The author examined the same cases and a dosen't agree with Prof.Xie's point of view.The reasons are as follows:1.The Iroquois,Athenians,Spartans and Romans are not peaceful peoples,as believed by Xie Weiyang,and there are full of external wars in their processes of evolution.2.The regime of the Aztec is not a despotic one,but a democratic one,or,at least,a non despotic one.Therefore,the forms of early regimes are not necessarily connected with the facts whether external wars have ever happened.

作者易建平

机构地区中国社会科学院世界历史所

出处《史学理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2000年第4期90-105,共16页 Historiography Bimonthly

关键词国家起源民主政治特征酋邦质权政治制度权力部落联盟对外战争文明起源

分类号 D031 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献38

1摩尔根.《古代社会》.杨东莼，马雍，马巨译，商务印书馆.1977年版，第120-124,130,132,133,140-145,187-215,268，302,304,308,309，331页.
2恩格斯.《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》[A]..《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷第2版[C].人民出版社,1995年..
3马克思.《路易斯·亨·摩尔根<古代社会>一书摘要》,《马克思古代社会史笔记》,人民出版社,1996年,第220-221页,第201页,第232页,第302页,第306页,第247-248页.
4Elman R. Service, Origins of the State and Civilization : The Process of Cultural Evolution (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975), pp.60-67,270 - 273,167-174,193-202,318,319.
5William A. Haviland, Cultural Anthropology(5th Edition. New York: CBS College Publishing, 1987), p.302.
6乔治·彼得·穆达克(即莫多克).《我们当代的原始民族》，童恩正译，四川省民族研究所.1980年版，第205页.
7Neta C．Crawford，A Security Regime among Democracies：Cooperation among Iroquois Nations，in Mark International Organization，48(1994)．No．3，PP．345—385．
8乔治·瓦伦特.《阿兹特克文明》，商务印书馆.1999年版，第122-123页，第127-130页，第251页.
9Robert L. Carneiro, A Theory of the Origin of the State, in Science, 169(1970), pp. 733 - 738.
10Robert L.Carneiro, Political Expansion as an Expression of the Principle of Competitive Exclusion, in Ronald Cohen and Elman R. Service, eds. , Origins of the State : The Anthropology of Political Evolution ( Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inc., 1978), pp.205-223.