期刊文献+

失语症的词类难度分析 被引量:1

Difficulty analysis of speech test materials in aphasics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解失语症患者的词类难度,我们对32例失语症患者进行了听词辨认与视图呼名检查,检查项目包括物品名词、动词、颜色名词、数词和拼音。每类6个词。听词辨认与视图呼名的检查项目完全相同。结果表明,失语症患者词类之间的难度存在着差异。最易理解的是物品名词((?)=10.587),其次是动词((?)=11.307),颜色名词((?)=12.56),数词((?)=13.106);最难理解的是拼音((?)=18.553)。视图呼名最容易的是动词((?)=13.907),其次是数词((?)=14.027),颜色名词((?)=14.747),物品名词((?)=15.073);最难呼名的是拼音((?)=18.583)。此外,词类的难度在输入(听理解)与输出(呼名)之间存在着差异。一般情况下,无论哪类词,输入较输出容易。 32 aphasics were tested with auditory comprehension and naming of objects, actions, numbers, colors and phonetic alphabets. The same items were used in the naming and comprehension tests. The results showed that the difficulties of word categories were different. The naming of objects were the easiest to comprehend(⊿=10.578),secondly the actions(⊿=11.307), then the colors(⊿=12.56), the numbers(⊿=13.106), and the phonetic alphabets were the most difficult to comprehend (⊿=18.553). The picture test showed that action naming were the easiest(⊿=13.907), secondly the numbers(⊿=14.027), then the colors(⊿=14.747), the objects(⊿=15.073), and the phonetic alphabets were the most difficult to name(⊿=18.583 ). Also the difficulty of the word categories was different between input (comprehension) and output (naming) tasks. In general, the input (comprehension) task was easier than the output naming one, no matter what categories they were.
作者 汪洁
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 1993年第4期151-153,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 失语症 词类难度 听理解 Aphasia Difficulty of parts of speech Auditory comprehension
  • 相关文献

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部