期刊文献+

卧底侦查的相关法律问题 被引量:8

An Approach to Law Questions of Secret lnvestigafion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卧底侦查是侦破有组织犯罪、团伙犯罪等案件的有效手段 ,阻却违法事由的紧急避险是其刑法理论基础。卧底侦查不同于教唆陷害 ,卧底警察具有不完整的教唆故意 ,欠缺可罚性。卧底警察在侦查中的犯罪行为合法化 ,不具有可罚性。卧底警察不应作证 ,其提供的材料不能作为证据。 Secret investigation is effective measure to investigate and uncover the cases of organized crime and gang crime,whose theoretical foundation of criminal law is non-illegal urgent danger prevention. Secret investigation is distinct from agent provocateur, because secret policemen have incomplete instigation on purpose, which is short of inculpation. Being short of inculpation legalizes the criminal offence of secret policemen in criminal investigation. Finally, secret policemen should not appear in court as witnesses and the material fumished by them can not be evidence to be sued in court.
作者 孙付
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《江苏公安专科学校学报》 2001年第5期71-75,共5页 Journal of Jiangsu Public Security College
关键词 侦查 秘密侦查 卧底侦查 刑法理论 investigation,undercover investigation, secret investigation, law
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Sorrells v.United States,287U.s.454(1932)
  • 2田宫裕著.《刑事诉讼法入门》第54页,有信堂高文社1985年.
  • 3河上和雄.《诱惑侦查的发展》[J].判例タィムズ,1982,:39-39.
  • 4Sorrells v,United States,287U,S.442(1932)
  • 5Sorrells v.United States, 287U,S.435 ( 1932 )
  • 6Sherman v.United States,356U.S.435(1958)
  • 7United States v.Russell, 411 U,S.423 ( 1973 )
  • 8Hampton v.United States,425 U.S,484(1976)
  • 9United States v,Twigg,588F.2d 373(1978)
  • 10泷贤太郎.《论诱惑侦查之必要性》[J].警察研究,1986,:16-16.

共引文献39

同被引文献63

引证文献8

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部