期刊文献+

英美文官制度的模式差异及其历史影响 被引量:7

Differences between the Civil Service Systems of the UK and the US and Their Historical Influences
原文传递
导出
摘要 The article analysis three differences between the basic patterns of civil service between Britain and the United States.They are the employment principles,position classifications and the political positions.Britain has paid attention to the generalists while the States has focused on the specialists.Britain has carried on the grade classifications while the States has practiced position classifications.In characterizing the political positions of the civil servants,Britain had demanded absolute neutrality while the States has only asked relative neutrality.However,the requests,no matter in Britain or in the United States,of the “neutrality” in the civil servants do not mean that they could completely get rid of the manipulation and the control from politics and the political parties. The article analysis three differences between the basic patterns of civil service between Britain and the United States.They are the employment principles,position classifications and the political positions.Britain has paid attention to the generalists while the States has focused on the specialists.Britain has carried on the grade classifications while the States has practiced position classifications.In characterizing the political positions of the civil servants,Britain had demanded absolute neutrality while the States has only asked relative neutrality.However,the requests,no matter in Britain or in the United States,of the “neutrality” in the civil servants do not mean that they could completely get rid of the manipulation and the control from politics and the political parties.
作者 石庆环
出处 《世界历史》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第6期2-12,共11页 World History
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1费雷德里克·F.莱德雷等.《通才与专才》( Frederick. F. Ridley, ed. , Generalists and Specialists),纽约1968年版,第1—10页
  • 2德雷莱·加文等.《现代文官制度》(Drewry Cavin and Tony Butcher, The Civil Service Today),伦敦1993年版,第46页
  • 3麦克·凯亭.《现代欧洲政治:主要民主国家的政府与它们的政治权力》(Michael Kating, The Modern European Politics,Governments and Their Political Powers in Major Democracies ),伦敦和纽约1993年版,第95-100页
  • 4麦克·凯亭.《现代欧洲政治:主要民主国家的政府与它们的政治权力》,第95-100页
  • 5布朗·史密斯.《大不列颠联合王国》(Brain Smith,"United Kingdom"),《比较研究:发达国家的公共管理体制)( Comparative Studies : The Public Administration in developed Democracies ),纽约1988年版,第73—74页
  • 6安东尼·H.博茨.《英国政府体制》( Anthony H. Birch, British Government System ),伦敦1985年版,第162-170页
  • 7加菲里·史密斯等.《英国政府和它的不满情绪》( Geoffery Smith and Nelson W. Polsby, British Government and Its Disconents),纽约1981年版,第144-168页
  • 8希尔顿·B.鲍威尔.《英国文官制度:现行文官录用与晋升方法和它对新兴国家的意义》( Hilton B. Power, "The British Civil Serivce: Its Present Method of Recruitment and Promotion and Their Implications for New States"), 《比较公共管理读本》( Readings in Comparative Public Administration ),波士顿1967年版,第118-134页
  • 9加菲里·史密斯等.《英国政府和它的不满情绪》,第144-168页.
  • 10斯蒂温·W.海斯等.《公共管理中的考试制度》(Steven W. Hays and Richard C. Kearney," Examination in the Public Service").《彭德尔顿法颁布一百周年:文官制度改革遗留的问题》(Centenary Issues of the Pendleton Act of 1883 : The Problematic Legacy of Civil Service Reform ),纽约1982年版,第27页

同被引文献19

引证文献7

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部