期刊文献+

美国规制诱惑侦查的法理评介 被引量:25

The Introduction and Evaluation of the Regulation of the Encouragement in USA
原文传递
导出
摘要 诱惑侦查 ,是刑事诉讼中一种特殊的侦查手段 ,其不当适用可能导致侦查陷阱。在美国判例法上 ,从对侦查陷阱的宽容态度到“陷阱之法理”再到“正当程序抗辩”,围绕诱惑侦查的合法性问题 ,演绎了规制侦查权的艰难历程 ,折射出侦查程序中关注人权保障的深层底蕴。由此得到启示 ,我国目前实践中诱惑侦查的无序状态也亟待法律规范。 Encouragement is a special investigation measure of criminal proceedings; it well perhaps results in police entrapment if the measure is used inappropriately. There is a arduous procedure involving the control of the investigation right whose core is the problem of the legality of the Encouragement in the American Case Law System, from the toleration to the Entrapment to the Law of Entrapment, thus to Due Process Defense. It reflects the deep-seated fundament of the guarantee of the human right in the investigation procedure. There is a desperate need of the regulation about the disorder of the Encouragement in the Chinese investigation practice nowadays and, the development of the control of the investigation right and the evaluation that is based on will give us enlightenment.
作者 吴丹红
出处 《国家检察官学院学报》 2001年第3期104-108,共5页 Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词 诱惑侦查 侦查陷阱 陷阱抗辩 正当程序抗辩 法律规制 encouragement police entrapment entrapment defense due process defense the regulation in law
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1马跃.美、日有关诱惑侦查的法理及论争之概观[J].法学,1998(11):16-23. 被引量:109
  • 2吴宏耀.论我国诱饵侦查制度的立法建构[J].人民检察,2001,(2).
  • 3(英)丹宁(AlfredThompsonDenning)著,李克强等.法律的正当程序[M]法律出版社,1999.
  • 4Sorrellsv.U .S,1932.
  • 5U .S .v.Russell,1973.
  • 6JeroldH .Israel,WayneR .Lafave.CriminalProcedure,1993.
  • 7DanielPotenberg.ThePoliceDetectionPracticeofEncouragementVaL Rev,1963.
  • 8Jacobsonv.U .SS Ct,1992.
  • 9JackHarrison.TheGovernmentasPornographerU CinL R,1993.
  • 10Hamptonv.U .S,1976.

共引文献120

同被引文献152

引证文献25

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部