摘要
刑法分则中有许多犯罪未规定犯罪目的,而理论和实践上一般认为,其中某些未规定目的的犯罪仍然应该具备某种特定目的,但在论证这些非法定目的犯之特定目的的存在时多局限于就罪论罪,缺少从犯罪构成整体的角度探讨其合理性。从构成要件构造的角度看,目的犯中的目的是主观违法的构成要件要素,当某种犯罪的构成要件中没有明确规定犯罪目的,而该目的对于犯罪的成立又是不可缺少的,法官就应对这一表明了违法性的构成要件要素作出补充,因而这些非法定目的犯在构成要件构造上属于开放性的构成要件;其未规定的犯罪目的,属于法律漏洞,对之应以目的性限缩的方法适用之。
Although crime purpose of many crimes are not regulated in the Criminal Law, it is still being considered as the constructive requirements of some crimes by the criminal theory and justice practice. With regards to the constructive conditions, It is believed in this essay that unregulated purpose of these kinds of crimes is an objective illegal element and it can be confirmed by judge's supplementing. In another word, the unregulated purpose belongs to law loophole, and the judge should use the purposive limiting methods to interpret it.
出处
《法律科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第5期47-59,共13页
Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law)
基金
.NULL.
