摘要
我国高等院校党史教材和国内诸多史书论著,普遍认定“毛泽东思想两个建议”的史实。通过对《毛泽东思想概论》、《彭德怀自述》等有关“两个建议”史实不同版本的比较论证分析,可得出“中央革命根据地第五次反‘围剿’战役后期的两个战略性建议,不是毛泽东提出来的”史实结论,否定国内史学界近半个世纪以来所认定的普遍观点。
It's the common sense, the party historical teaching materials in colleges and universities and many internal historical books think that MaoZe-d ong's “Two Suggestions' are historical facts. From the comparative proof analy sis about “Two Suggestions' between two different editions “Survey of MaoZe-dong's thoughts' and “PengDe-huai's Self-Statement', we can conclude the hi storical facts that the two strategy suggestions raised during the later period of the central authorities of revolutionary base area Fifth anti-encircle and s uppress campaign, was not put forward by MaoZe-dong and their's negated the com mon view of internal historical fields since half of century.
出处
《江西公安专科学校学报》
2002年第5期5-7,共3页
Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College
关键词
“两个建议”
史实
质疑
论证
Two Suggestions'
historical facts
call in question
proof