世界民法典编纂史上的三次论战——“法典化”与“非法典化”思想之根源与比较

Three Debates in the World History of Compilation of Civil Law:A Comparative Study on Theoretical Roots of Codifying and Non - Codifying

论文从一个比较观察的视角,对发生在不同国度和时代的世界民法典编纂史上的三次论战进行了系统的历史回顾和理论阐述,探讨了由此引发的“法典化”与“非法典化”思想及其对立的根源,以及三次论战对于各国法律思想史和法制发展的走势所具有的深远意义和重大价值。在上述基础上,文章还围绕当代中国民法典编纂所提出的各种观点和论说进行了某种程度的学术思考。

From comparative perception and view, this article provides a historical review and makes a statement to the three debates in compilation of civil law took place in various countries and times. It explores the theoretical root causes for the contrasts between codification and non - codification and the far - reaching influences and values of the debates to the development of the legal systems and legal thinking as well. Based on the above writing, the article raises some points on the discussion of codification of civil law in China.