摘要
1990年3月~1991年6月采用B超仪对孕期宫颈评分120例,其中50例与阴道宫颈评分对照:高分组,自然临产和100%引产成功,中分组,17.2%引产成功,82.8%用药后方可引产成功,低分组引产均失败。B超宫颈评分对引产时机、方法、剖宫产时机的选择,对早产的预防、治疗、预后有很重要的意义,本组B超宫颈评分虽与阴道宫颈评分结果相近,但B超评分有客观指标,无痛苦,无损伤,减少感染,不额外增加孕妇的经济负担,应视为妊娠期宫颈评分的首选方法。
One hundred and twenty cases of cervices which were in gestation were marked by US in our hospital from march, 1990 to June, 1991, Fifty if then were compared with vagina cervix mark. The high-grade group: Natural parturition or 100% were induced successfully, The middle grade group: 17.2% were induced successfully, 82.8% were induced unsuccessfully, Using US to mark cervices is very useful to the choice of opportunity of induction opportunity and its method, the decision cascarean birth, as well as for the prevention, treatment and prognosis of prevature delivery. Although the results of this group of US cervix mark is similar to that of vagina cerOvix mark, US mark has objective indexes, no pain and no harm, It can reduce infection and does not increase the economic bruden of pregnant woman. It should be choiced first as the method to mark the gastationing cervices.
出处
《中华超声影像学杂志》
CSCD
1993年第4期173-175,共3页
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
关键词
宫颈评分
超声波诊断
B—mode ultrasonography
cervix mark