期刊文献+

硬膜外微电脑输液泵注药与常规推注和滴注给药麻醉的比较 被引量:6

A Comparison of Epidural Administration by a Computerized Infusion Pump with Conventional Injection Technic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 44例胃或胆囊切除术病人根据硬膜外腔给药方法随机分为泵输注组(n=17)、持续滴注组(n=14)和常规推注组(n=13)。在泵输注和滴注组,首次量2%利多卡因经硬膜外导管以1ml/min输入,首次量进入后以首次量/h持续输入,直至术毕。推注组首次量以1ml/3s经硬膜外导管推注以后每间隔lh追加首次量。麻醉起效时间和阻滞范围无明显差别。作者指出硬膜外腔泵输注给药方法简化,初步实现给药自动化,不影响硬膜外腔的扩散。 orty-four patients schedulled for cholecystectomy or gastrectomy were devided into continous pump infusiongroup (group P,n=17),continous drop infusion group (group D,n=14),and conventional injective group(group C,n=13).An initiatial dose of 2% lidocaine was infused into the epidural space via epidural catheter atrate of 1ml/min,which was followed by half-initial dose per hour till the end of operation in group P and D. Aninitial dose of 2% lidocaine was injected at rate of 1ml/3s and supplemented with half-initial dose everv hour ingroup C,There was no significant difference in analgesic level among three groups. It suggestes that epidural ad-ministration with infusion pump is simple and effective.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1994年第6期314-315,共2页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
  • 相关文献

同被引文献20

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部