摘要
比较瞬时法、平均法和逐层平均法3种水汽输送气候计算方案,发现它们的输送方向大致相同,输送量差异显著。瞬时法最准确;逐层平均法次之,但误差的年际波动较大;平均法虽然简单然而误差大。
Comparison is made among three climatological calculation techniques for watertransfer in the atmosphere。They include the instantaneous,averaging and layer-to-layermean methods.Results show that all these methods are able to display roughly the same direction for water transfer but with remarkable difference in the amount,Comparison indicatesthat the instantaneous method is most accurate and layer-to-layer mean method next to it butwith rather a big interannual fluctuiation in errors.And the averaging technique,though sim-ple,is prone to produce large errors。
出处
《南京气象学院学报》
CSCD
1994年第3期372-378,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology
基金
国家自然科学基金
关键词
水汽输送
气候计算
瞬时法
平均法
vapor(water)transportation,climatological calctilation,instantaneous method,averaging technique,layer to layer mean methods